What to know about possible Russia-Ukraine peace talks in TurkeyNew Foto - What to know about possible Russia-Ukraine peace talks in Turkey

TALLINN, Estonia (AP) — The talks have taken place in the warring capitals of Moscow and Kyiv, from Washington and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to countries across Europe. Now, all eyes are finally turning to Istanbul to seek an end to Russia's 3-year-old,full-scale invasionof Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putinproposed restarting direct peace talksThursday with Ukraine in the Turkish city that straddles Asia and Europe. And President Volodymyr Zelenskyychallenged the Kremlin leaderto meet in Turkey in person. What will unfold remains unclear. The Kremlin has refused to confirm who's going to Turkey and whether it will include Putin. Ukrainian presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak said Zelenskyy will only sit down with the Russian leader. Zelenskyy said Tuesday that "if Putin does not arrive and plays games, it is the final point that he does not want to end the war." What's known about the possible talks: How did the idea of talks in Turkey arise? On Saturday, Zelenskyy hosted French President Emmanuel Macron, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk in a show of unity. They issued a coordinated call for a 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine starting Monday. The plan has received backing from the European Union and U.S.President Donald Trump, who had promised during his campaign to swiftly end the war that is now in its fourth year. The leaders pledged tougher sanctions on Russia if Putin did not accept the proposal. In remarks to the media early Sunday, however,Putin effectively rejectedthe offer and proposedrestarting direct talks with Ukrainein Istanbul instead "without preconditions." He did not specify whether he envisioned the talks to involve Zelenskyy and himself personally, or with lower-level officials. Zelenskyy responded by insisting on a ceasefire, saying he will travel to Turkey — and challenged Putin to do the same: "I will be waiting for Putin in (Turkey) on Thursday. Personally. I hope that this time the Russians will not look for excuses." Who's coming and why? Pressed by reporters on who will represent Russia in Istanbul, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov refused to say, stressing that Putin had outlined Russia's position clearly enough. Trump's administration initiated separate talks with Russia and Ukrainein Saudi Arabiain March. But since then, the administration has indicated it might withdraw from the process if no tangible progress is made. Trump said Monday he was optimistic about the talks — a sharp contrast to a contentious Oval Office meeting with Zelenskyy on Feb. 28. There is "the potential for a good meeting" between Putin and Zelenskyy, Trump said in Washington. He added he was "thinking about flying over" after his visit to Qatar and the United Arab Emirates but later said Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others from the U.S. will go to Turkey for the talks. Podolyak on Tuesday told a YouTube broadcast by prominent Russian journalists in exile that the Ukrainian leader won't be meeting any Russian officials in Istanbul other than Putin. He added that "there are always people" in Zelenskyy's entourage who can "conduct certain negotiations at corresponding levels" with the Russians but questioned the point of a lower-level meeting. "Undoubtedly, only Putin can make the decision to continue the war or stop the war," he said. Zelenskyy said Tuesday he will meet with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in the capital Ankara, and wait there. If the Russian leader chooses Istanbul for the meeting, Zelenskyy said, then he and Erdogan will travel there. If Putin doesn't show, European and U.S. leaders should follow through with additional sanctions against Russia, he added. What happened at talks in Istanbul in 2022? The Kremlin billed Thursday's talks as a "restarting" of peace negotiations in Istanbul in 2022, early on in the war, that quickly fell apart. Moscow had blamed Ukraine and the West for their alleged desire to continue fighting, while Kyiv said Russia's demands amounted to an ultimatum rather than something the sides could mutually agree on. Zelenskyy has said the Russian delegation's demands included Ukraine's recognition of Russian control over the Donbas, an area in eastern Ukraine consisting of Donetsk and Luhansk regions; constitutional amendments to declare neutrality; a significant reduction of Ukraine's armed forces; and the surrender of long-range weaponry. "There were never any negotiations; it was an ultimatum from a murderer," he said in 2022. Putin accused Ukraine of derailing a peace deal that was basically agreed on and included clauses of Ukraine's neutral and nonnuclear status and details on how much its army would be reduced. "The Kyiv authorities ... just threw it all away. They turned it down," Putin said in 2023. The Kremlin has said repeatedly "the Istanbul agreements" could serve as a basis for further peace talks. After Moscow illegally annexed the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in September 2022, Russian authorities started saying that Kyiv should also recognize "the reality on the ground." What are both sides' demands to end the war? Putin last year demanded that Ukraine cede the four regions, which it still does not fully control. He also wants Kyiv to recognize the Crimean Peninsula, also illegally annexed by Moscow in 2014, as Russian; Ukraine also must renounce its bid to join NATO and drastically reduce its army. He also demanded that the West lift sanctions imposed on Moscow after the invasion. Kyiv, in turn, refused to cede any land and wants robust security guarantees against future Russian aggression. Trump, who has engaged in a broad diplomatic effort to end the war since taking office, has said that Crimea, "will stay with Russia." He has also said that Kyiv was unlikely to ever join NATO. What's happening on the battlefield? Both sides are preparing a warm weather campaign on the battlefield, where a war of attrition has killed tens of thousands of soldiers on both sides along the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line. The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said Russia is "quickly replenishing front-line units with new recruits to maintain the battlefield initiative." In 2024 and more recently, Russian troops have made slow but steady gains in several sections along the front. Putin said in March that Russian troops have "gained steam" and "are holding strategic initiative all along the line of contact." Zelenskyy warned that Russia was delaying talks in preparation for bigger offensives. Last month, Moscow's forces also declared that they fully reclaimed chunks of Russia's Kursk region bordering Ukraine that Kyiv's forces seized in a surprise incursion in August 2024. Kyiv denied the claim, but it has been steadily losing ground there as Moscow, aided by North Korean soldiers, worked to push them out and leave Ukraine without a key negotiating chip. Several attempts to establish at least a partial ceasefire have been unsuccessful. Russia effectively rejected a 30-day unconditional truce; the Kremlin instead declared two short, unilateral ceasefires for holidays in the last two months -– one for30 hours at Easterand another for 72 hours to coincide withRussia's World War II Victory Daycelebrations. In both cases, Kyiv and Moscow accused each other of failing to halt the fighting. Russia and Ukraine also pledged in March to observe a 30-day halt to attacking energy infrastructure that was brokered by the Trump administration. Both sides repeatedly accused each other of massive violations until the measure expired.

What to know about possible Russia-Ukraine peace talks in Turkey

What to know about possible Russia-Ukraine peace talks in Turkey TALLINN, Estonia (AP) — The talks have taken place in the warring capitals ...
A still-unfolding diplomatic road seeking peace in Ukraine has had many twists and turnsNew Foto - A still-unfolding diplomatic road seeking peace in Ukraine has had many twists and turns

It was a weekend of diplomatic announcements onthe war in Ukraine. First, European leaders assembled in Kyiv on Saturday with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to put pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin fora ceasefire. Then, after midnight, the Kremlin leader surfaced in Moscow tounveil a proposal for talksin Istanbul, Turkey. If both Putin and Zelenskyy sit down with each other,it would be a firstin the 3-year-old war. Key events that have shaped efforts to end the war since Russia invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022: Feb. 28, 2022: Ukrainian and Russian delegations meet in neighboring Belarusfor the first timeafter the invasion. Talks continue over the next two weeks, but no apparent agreements emerge other than a decision to set up humanitarian corridors for civilians. March 21, 2022: Zelenskyy calls for direct talks with Putin but is rebuffed by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. A day later, Zelenskyy says he is prepared todiscuss a commitmentfor Ukraine to not to seek NATO membership in exchange for a ceasefire, the withdrawal of Russian troops and a guarantee of Ukraine's security. March 29, 2022: Talks begin in Istanbul, Turkey, with Moscow saying it's willing to"fundamentally cut back" military activitynear Kyiv and the northern city of Chernihiv, while Ukraine said it was open to discussing neutral status for Ukraine if its security is backed by other nations. April 7, 2022: Lavrov rejects aUkrainian peace proposal as "unacceptable." He says Kyiv has walked back on an agreement to exempt the Crimean Peninsula from wider Ukrainian security guarantees. Russia illegally annexed Crimea in 2014. April 26, 2022: U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres visits Russia to discuss ending the war. May 13, 2022:U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austincalls his Russian counterpart, Sergei Shoigu, in their first contact since before the start of the war. July 22, 2022: Russia and Ukraine, with mediation by Turkey and the U.N., agreeon a dealto unblock supplies of grain stuck in Ukraine's Black Sea ports, ending a standoff that threatened global food security. The deal expires a year later. Sept. 22, 2022:Zelenskyy addresses the U.N. General Assembly, laying out five "nonnegotiable" conditions, including a "just punishment" for Russia. Sept. 30, 2022: Russiaillegally annexesthe Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, even though it doesn't fully control any of them. Ukraine responds by applying to join NATO and by enacting a decree thatdeclares negotiations with Putin "impossible". Nov. 15, 2022: Zelenskyy unveils a 10-point peace plan at the G20 summit in Bali. June 25, 2023: Officials from 15 countries, including the U.S., the European Union, India, Brazil, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey meet in Copenhagen, Denmark, to discuss Zelenskyy's peace plan. Aug. 5, 2023: Two days of discussions on the war begin in Saudi Arabia with delegates from 40 countries, but not Russia. No joint statements are issued. Oct. 28, 2023: Delegates from 65 countries meet in Malta to continue talks on Zelenskyy's peace plan. Russia, which has dismissed the talks, was not invited. June 15, 2024: Representatives of 92 nations meet inNidwalden, Switzerland, to discuss Ukraine's peace plan. Despite the growing number of delegates, a consensus remains elusive. The summit's final statement is backed by most – although not all – participants. Dec. 7, 2024: U.S. President-electDonald Trumptravels to Paris and meets Zelenskyy and other European leaders. Feb 12. 2025: Trump and Putin speak directly via telephone and agree to begin negotiations on ending Ukraine war in a phone call that abruptly ended a three-year U.S.-led effort to isolate Putin over Ukraine. Feb. 18, 2025: Russian and U.S. officials, including Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, meet in Saudi Arabia and agree to work toward ending the war, as well as restoring bilateral ties. Ukrainian officials are not invited. Feb. 28, 2025: Zelenskyy meets with Trump, Rubio and Vice President JD Vance in the White House but tensions break out in the Oval Office and a proposedminerals deal between the countriesis left unsigned. March 11, 2025: U.S. and Ukrainian officials meet in Saudi Arabia, with American officials putting forward a plan for a 30-day ceasefire. Kyiv agrees to the proposed truce. March 13, 2025: Putin effectively rejects the ceasefire plan, stating certain issues still must be resolved. He also meets with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow. Witkoff would travel to Russia two more times in April to meet Putin. March 18, 2025: A proposal is put forward for a temporary halt on strikes on energy infrastructure. Both sides agree to the plan, but soon accuse each other of violations, and the measure later expires. April 19, 2025:Putin announces a 30-hour ceasefireto mark the Easter holiday, although attackscontinue across Ukraine. April 28, 2025: The Kremlin declares a unilateral 72-hour ceasefire starting May 8 to mark Russia's Victory Day celebrating the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II. Kyiv does not agree, preferring a 30-day truce proposed by U.S. officials. Both sides accuse each other of violating it. May 10, 2025: French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk meet with Zelenskyy in Kyiv and urge Russia to enact a 30-day truce starting May 12. May 11, 2025:Putin proposes restarting direct talkswith Ukraine in Istanbul on May 15, "without preconditions," but does not agree to the 30-day ceasefire Zelenskyy challenges Putin tomeet personally in Turkey. May 12, 2025: Trump says he is "thinking about flying over" to Turkey for the talks after his visit to Qatar and the United Arab Emirates but later says Rubio and other U.S. officials will go. May 13, 2025: Ukrainian presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak says Zelenskyy won't meet with any representative of Russia in Turkey except for Putin. Zelenskyy says he and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan will wait for Putin in Ankara, adding: "If Putin does not arrive and plays games, it is the final point that he does not want to end the war."

A still-unfolding diplomatic road seeking peace in Ukraine has had many twists and turns

A still-unfolding diplomatic road seeking peace in Ukraine has had many twists and turns It was a weekend of diplomatic announcements onthe ...
Virginia GOP embraced a diverse ticket in this year's elections. Then things got complicatedNew Foto - Virginia GOP embraced a diverse ticket in this year's elections. Then things got complicated

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Republicans engaged in scrubbing the federal government of diversity, equity and inclusion programs are fielding a historically diverse ticket in Virginia in one of the only states holding elections this year. Those two things aren't inherently incompatible, and some experts say nominating diverse candidates could reinforce the argument that officeholders should be chosen on merit. But in the shadow of Washington, wherePresident Donald Trump's push to stamp out DEI programs has caused turmoil atcolleges,businessesand throughout thefederal government, things have gotten complicated. Conservative stalwart John Reid, a talk-radio host whose father was a Virginia delegate, is the first openly gay man to be a statewide nominee in Virginia. He was sailing toward the general election as the GOP's choice for lieutenant governor when Republican opposition research linked him to a blog featuring photographs of naked men, first reported by The Richmonder, an online news site. In late April, days after the ticket solidified, Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin called Reid and asked him to drop out after learning about the Tumblr account with a username matching the candidate's Instagram handle. Reid said the account was a fabrication and made clear he wasstaying in the race. Days later, he accused Youngkin's team of extortion. "I'm really angry to be betrayed by people I personally supported, and I'm really saddened for what is happening to our party right now," Reid said the following week. Youngkin's effort to oust Reid backfired. Republicans rallied to the nominee's side, or at least offered tepid support. Lt. Gov.Winsome Earle-Sears, a Jamaican migrant and Marine veteran vying to be the state's first female governor, released a statement days after the news broke, saying it was "his race, and his decision alone to move forward." Some Republicans were more forceful,creating merchandisesaying "In John Reid We Trust." Former Republican Gov. Jim Gilmore told a group of reporters, "I still endorse John, and I'm standing by my endorsement." Others were quick to back Youngkin. The conservative lobbying group Family Foundation Action wrote in a statement that voters want "elected officials who represent their values." On Monday, a Virginia Republican who failed to qualify for the primary for lieutenant governor launched awrite-in campaignfor the position. Former Republican Rep. Bob Good said Reid should drop out. The controversy comes five years after Good ousted formerGOP Rep. Denver Riggleman, who lost his party's nomination for reelection in a conservative district after officiating a same-sex wedding. "If we can't get over how other people live, I think the Republican Party is dead in Virginia,"Riggleman said at the time. Youngkin, widely viewed as a possible presidential candidate in 2028, backed off within a week, describing his conversation with the candidate as a distraction from the election ahead. In the meantime, a get-together for the candidates with the tagline "Ever Forward," which had been scheduled before Youngkin phoned Reid but suddenly was loaded with new meaning, had been canceled. Reid rebooked the rally at the same time and place. But instead of celebrating the ticket, he celebrated his own candidacy as other top-of-the-ticket Republicans stayed away. A precarious position In a party that nominated a president who said at his inauguration that he would not allow the government to "socially engineer race and gender into every aspect of public and private life," experts say, Virginia's candidates were already in a precarious position. "They're not really able to capitalize on it as an advantage, because it works against too much of what else the rhetoric is saying," said political analyst Geoff Kabaservice, vice president of political studies at the center-right Niskanen Center. Still, GOP candidates have engaged in those conversations. Reid said in a statement when he launched his campaign that he was not a diversity hire. In aMarch Facebook post, he wrote: "Diversity itself is not a strength. Common values and shared goals amongst diverse people is a strength." Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares, seeking reelection as the first Latino man and first-generation Cuban American to hold statewide office, hassupporteddismantlingDEI programs. And Earle-Sears connected DEI to slavery in a fundraising email first reported by Politico. David Hopkins, a Boston College professor who studies voting behavior, said the strategy of distancing themselves from DEI, regardless of whether the idea is popular, made sense. "There's a political logic that says if you're going to run against DEI programs and Democrats are saying: 'Oh, you're just playing to racism. You're playing to prejudice,' that actually nominating diverse candidates ... can be an especially powerful way to handle the issue." Polls have shown growing frustration with Trump's administration. Americans are nearly twice as likely to say Trump has mostly focused on the wrong priorities as the right ones, according to a survey fromThe Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Anotherrecent poll indicatesthat some disagree with his attacks on DEI, finding that people are more likely to support than oppose university services to help underrepresented students and courses that teach about racism. The election was already going to be a challenge for Republicans in Virginia, which carries out statewide elections in the year following a presidential election. The commonwealth remains one of a dwindling number willing to elect leaders from both parties statewide. Its voters have often voted for a governor from the partyopposite of the one in the Oval Office. Ever forward — sort of ... At the event formerly known as "Ever Forward," now a Reid campaign rally, hundreds of supporters carrying John Reid posters bustled into Atlas 42, an event space in the suburban county outside Richmond that his father represented for decades. "This is something they would do in the '50s or '60s," Republican Nancy Akers said as she lined up to hear Reid speak. "I thought we were away from that by now. His private life is his private life." Carey Allen, a Republican from Chester, Virginia, also expressed frustration: "Number one, I don't believe the account was his. Number two, I don't think it's relevant." Earle-Sears, across town, threw the first pitch at aminor league baseball game. Miyares did not attend, either. Gilmore was with Reid, working the crowd. Still, as constituents crowded around Reid, the other candidates' absence did not seem to weigh on them. One woman walked up to Reid and gave him a bear hug. As they embraced, she said, "I love you." Another man shook Reid's hand and murmured in his ear, "This is really powerful." An older gentleman walked up to Reid and gently shook his hand, handing him an envelope. Reid thanked him before tucking the envelope into his inside pocket. When Reid first took the stage, the crowd roared and chanted his name. "I'd say that this is a pretty big, good distraction!" he exclaimed.

Virginia GOP embraced a diverse ticket in this year's elections. Then things got complicated

Virginia GOP embraced a diverse ticket in this year's elections. Then things got complicated RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Republicans engaged in...
Trump to meet Syria's president before heading to Qatar on his Mideast tourNew Foto - Trump to meet Syria's president before heading to Qatar on his Mideast tour

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) — PresidentDonald Trumpis set to meet Wednesday with Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa,going face-to-facewith the onetime insurgent leader who spent years imprisoned by U.S. forces after being captured in Iraq. The White House said Trump has agreed to "say hello" to al-Sharaa before the U.S. leader wraps uphis stay in Saudi Arabiaand heads to Qatar, where Trump is to be honored with a state visit. His Mideast tour also will take him to the United Arab Emirates. Al-Sharaa was named president of Syria in January, a month after a stunning offensive by insurgent groups led by al-Sharaa'sHayat Tahrir al-Sham, or HTS, stormed Damascus andended the 54-year rule of the Assad family. Trump said he agreed to meet with al-Sharaa after being encouraged to do so by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The president also pledged to lift yearslong sanctions on Syria. "There is a new government that will hopefully succeed in stabilizing the country and keeping peace," Trump said in awide-ranging foreign policy addressTuesday in which he announced he was lifting the sanctions that have been in place in Syria since 2011. "That's what we want to see in Syria." Formerly known by the nom de guerre Abu Mohammed al-Golani, al-Sharaa joined the ranks of al-Qaida insurgents battling U.S. forces in Iraq after the U.S.-led invasion and still faces a warrant for his arrest on terrorism charges in Iraq. The U.S. once offered $10 million for information about his whereabouts because of his links to al-Qaida. Al-Sharaa came back to his home country of Syria after the conflict began in 2011 and led al-Qaida's branch that used to be known as the Nusra Front. He later changed the name of his group to Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and cut links with al-Qaida. The sanctions go back to the rule of Bashar Assad, who was ousted in December, and were intended to inflict major pain on his economy. Both the Biden and Trump administrations had left the sanctions in place after Assad's fall as they sought to take the measure of al-Sharaa, who has renounced his past affiliation with al-Qaida. Trump is also set to attend a meeting Wednesday of the Gulf Cooperation Council, made up of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, before setting off for Qatar, the second stop in his Mideast tour. Qatar, like the other Gulf Arab states, is an autocratic nation where political parties are banned and speech is tightly controlled. It is overseen by its ruling emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. Sheikh Tamim, 44, took power in June 2013 when his father stepped down. Oil exports in Qatar began after World War II, though it would take until 1997 before Qatar began shipping out liquefied natural gas to the world. That brought unfathomable wealth — and new influence — to this small nation that sticks out like a thumb into the Persian Gulf. Qatar founded the satellite news network Al Jazeera, which brought an Arab perspective to mass media that helped fuel the 2011 Arab Spring protests. The network also became famous for running statements from al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden. Qatar follows an ultraconservative form of Sunni Islam known as Wahhabism born out of Saudi Arabia. However, Qatar struck a different tack in the Arab Spring by backing Islamists, including Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood and former Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, as well as those who rose up against Assad. Its support of Islamists, in part, led to a yearslong boycott of the country by Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. That boycott only ended as then-President Joe Biden prepared to enter the White House in 2021. Qatar also has served as a key mediator, particularly with the militant group Hamas as the international community pursues a ceasefire for the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip. Qatar also served as host of the negotiations between the United States and the Taliban that led to America's 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan. Qatar is home to Al-Udeid Air Base, a sprawling facility that hosts the forward headquarters of the U.S. military's Central Command. The oil-rich country is also in thecenter of a controversyover its offer to provide Trump with the gift of a luxuryBoeing747-8 that the U.S. could use as Air Force One while new versions of the plane are under construction by Boeing. The Qatari government has said a final decision hasn't been made. But Trump has defended the idea as a fiscally smart move for the U.S., even as critics argue it would amount to a president accepting an astonishingly valuable gift from a foreign government. Trump has indicated he would refurbish the aircraft and it would later be donated to his post-White House presidential library. He says he would not use the plane once he leaves office. The president, early Wednesday in a social media post, said the plane "is a gift from a Nation, Qatar, that we have successfully defended for many years." "Why should our military, and therefore our taxpayers, be forced to pay hundreds of millions of Dollars when they can get it for FREE from a country that wants to reward us for a job well done," Trump added. "This big savings will be spent, instead, to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! Only a FOOL would not accept this gift on behalf of our Country."

Trump to meet Syria's president before heading to Qatar on his Mideast tour

Trump to meet Syria's president before heading to Qatar on his Mideast tour RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) — PresidentDonald Trumpis set to m...
A pregnant Cuban emigre worries about her baby's citizenship as Supreme Court weighs a Trump orderNew Foto - A pregnant Cuban emigre worries about her baby's citizenship as Supreme Court weighs a Trump order

WASHINGTON (AP) — Barbara, a Cuban emigre 30 weeks into a high-risk pregnancy, is dealing with the additional stress of not knowing for sure that her baby girl will be an American citizen. "It scares me a lot that my baby will be born without citizenship because she would not be a citizen of this country. Claiming Cuban citizenship is not an option because we are fleeing from that country," she said. "I really don't know what kind of future my baby would face. I am terrified that my baby will be born without citizenship. It would be like she would be stateless. It's terrible." The 35-year-old woman lives in Kentucky, which is not among the 22 states that sued to challenge PresidentDonald Trump'sexecutive orderthat would deny citizenship to children who are born on U.S. soil to parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily. Lower courts have so farblockedthe executive order from taking effect anywhere in the United States. In arguments Thursday, theSupreme Courtweighs the Trump administration's request to narrow those court orders so that they cover only the parties that sued in federal court. Affected children born in Kentucky would not be citizens, if the court sides with the administration. The woman agreed to an interview with The Associated Press on condition that her last name not be used and her face not be shown on camera. Barbara has joined the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, one of the groups that sued over birthright citizenship. Members of the group likely would be protected under court orders. She was a lawyer in Cuba before fleeing religious persecution in 2022 with her husband, a daughter, now 4, and her parents, Barbara said. They are seeking political asylum in the United States. "I would not want my daughter to grow up in a society that excludes her. As a citizen, she will have a lot of rights. I don't know exactly how many places she would not be able to access if she were not a citizen," Barbara said. A possible outcome of the court case is babies born to immigrant mothers at the same time in the same American hospital would have different status. One might be a U.S. citizen; the other might not. Birthright citizenship is among several issues the administration has asked the court to deal with on an emergency basis, after lower courts acted to slow Trump's agenda. Several of those relate toimmigration. The justices are considering the administration's pleas toend humanitarian parolefor more than 500,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela andstrip othertemporary legal protections from another 350,000 Venezuelans. The administration also remainslocked in legal battlesover its efforts to swiftly deport people accused of being gang members to a prison in El Salvador under an 18th century wartime law called the Alien Enemies Act. If the court agrees to limit the ability of judges to issue nationwide, or universal, injunctions, the restrictions would be allowed to take effect for now in at least 27 states. The current fight is over what rules will apply while the lawsuits proceed through the courts. But even though the high court is not expected to issue a final decision about birthright citizenship, a ruling for the administration could lead to a confusing, if temporary, patchwork of rules that might differ based on what state children are born in or whether they are members of immigrants rights groups that sued. Birthright citizenship automatically makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen, including children born to mothers in the country illegally, under long-standing rules. The right was enshrined soon after the Civil War in the first sentence ofthe Constitution's 14th Amendment. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside," the Citizenship Clause reads. Since at least 1898 and the Supreme Court case of Wong Kim Ark, the provision has been widely interpreted to make citizens of everyone born on U.S. soil except for the children of diplomats, who have allegiance to another government; enemies present in the U.S. during hostile occupation; and, until a federal law changed things in 1924, sovereign Native American tribes. Trump and his supporters have argued that there should be tougher standards for becoming an American citizen, which he called "a priceless and profound gift" in the executive order. Trump's order would deny citizenship to children if neither parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident. Those categories include people who are in the country illegally or temporarily because, the administration contends, they are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. In the Supreme Court case, the administration spends little time defending Trump's executive order, focusing instead on what it calls "an epidemic" of nationwide, or universal, injunctions. "The need for this Court's intervention has become urgent as universal injunctions have reached tsunami levels," Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in a court filing. Judges have issued 39 such orders against the administration so far, the Justice Department said. At least two justices,Clarence ThomasandNeil Gorsuch, have said they believe individual judges lack the power to issue nationwide injunctions. Several others have suggested the injunctions raise questions the court might someday answer. But New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin, leading one of the lawsuits, said this is not the right case to deal with the issue because Trump is offering a "warped reading" of the 14th Amendment that is at odds with Supreme Court precedent. "I do think this is a very imperfect vehicle to have to raise the question about nationwide injunctions ... because it's very clear that the 14th Amendment applies uniformly across states if you're born here," Platkin said. ___ Associated Press writer Valerie Gonzalez in McAllen, Texas, contributed to this report.

A pregnant Cuban emigre worries about her baby's citizenship as Supreme Court weighs a Trump order

A pregnant Cuban emigre worries about her baby's citizenship as Supreme Court weighs a Trump order WASHINGTON (AP) — Barbara, a Cuban em...

 

TEC POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com