In Tesla's wake, more big companies propose voting "Dexit" to depart Delaware

By Tom Hals WILMINGTON, DEL. (Reuters) -In the coming weeks, investors in nine public companies worth at least $1 billion each will vote on proposals to ditch Delaware as their place of incorporation, potentially denting the state's longtime reputation as Corporate America's capital, Reuters has found. Five companies with a stock market value of at least $1 billion have moved their legal home out of Delaware since last year, in what some have nicknamed "Dexit." Tesla made a high-profile move to Texas last year and in April, President Donald Trump's social media company Trump Media & Technology, which owns the Truth Social platform, decamped to Florida. Most of the companies are dominated by a significant shareholder or founder. Delaware judges have expanded the court's most stringent legal standard to a growing range of situations involving controllers, increasing the risk of shareholder lawsuits. The decisions culminated with the blockbuster ruling last year that rescinded Musk's $56 billion pay package from Tesla. Less than an hour after the ruling, Musk said on X: "Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware." Musk's SpaceX and Tesla soon reincorporated in Texas. Musk did not respond to a request for comment. Trump Media, which is controlled by a trust that owns shares on behalf of President Trump and is overseen by his oldest son, said in its March proxy statement that Delaware's "increasingly litigious environment facing corporations with controlling stockholders has created unpredictability in decision-making." The company cited the Musk pay ruling as an example. It is now incorporated in Florida. Dropbox and The Trade Desk, which each has a large shareholder, and Cannae Holdings have moved their charter to Nevada from Delaware. They did not respond to a request for comment. Among the companies set to vote on proposals to leave are Simon Property Group, which is seeking shareholder approval on Wednesday to reincorporate in Indiana, and gaming platform Roblox, which wants to move to Nevada. Unlike many of the other companies that have proposed a "Dexit," Simon does not have a controlling shareholder. It declined to comment on its reasons for proposing a move, referring to its latest proxy statement. Roblox said that Nevada law provides greater predictability. To be sure, the share of Delaware-based companies in the Russell 3000 index, which covers nearly all public companies, continues to grow, rising to 62% last year from 56% in 2020, according to ISS-Corporate. However, 2024 was the first year that more companies in the Russell Index left Delaware than moved their incorporation to the state. "On the Richter scale, it's not that high," said Benjamin Edwards, a professor at the UNLV School of Law, of the changes. "But it's still shaking the ground." FEARING AN EXODUS Delaware, which has no sales tax, gets around a third of its general budget revenue from fees and taxes related to chartering businesses. Fearing an exodus of companies leaving after the judicial rulings, the state enacted legislation in March that limits the role of the state's judges in reviewing certain corporate deals. It also limited the scope of so-called "books and records" requests, a legal tool often used by shareholder attorneys to try to obtain directors' emails and texts. Despite the recent changes, corporate law in Delaware remains relatively strict when it comes to insiders making deals that would likely benefit them directly, such as a deal to buy assets from a controlling shareholder or Musk and his Tesla pay arrangement, legal experts said. "That's one area where Delaware has consistently said, 'Look, we're going to kick the tires of those decisions with a little bit extra force'," said Eric Talley, a professor at Columbia Law School. Delaware law typically requires a company that strikes a deal with a controlling shareholder to prove the arrangement met a strict standard showing the price and process were fair, unless it was negotiated by independent directors or approved by shareholders. In Nevada, the same controlling shareholder deal would likely be protected by a legal standard known as the business judgment rule, which shields against lawsuits, regardless of how it was negotiated and approved, legal experts said. Talley said Nevada directors are protected unless they engage in fraud. "It's actually okay to engage in self-dealing, as long as you don't lie about it," he said. A state's corporate law governs a company's relationship with shareholders and typically does not affect legal rights of employees or consumers. In Texas, where Tesla and SpaceX are now incorporated, lawmakers last week approved amendments to its corporate law that are aimed at reducing the threat of shareholder litigation, in part by allowing companies to set stock ownership thresholds for lawsuits. The plaintiff in the Musk pay case owned just nine shares when he filed suit in 2018. Governor Greg Abbott has not signed the bill and his office did not respond to a request for comment. Eric Lentell, the general counsel at Delaware-chartered Archer Aviation, said the aircraft developer is considering reincorporating in Texas and believes directors of other public companies should reconsider Delaware. After a Delaware judge refused last year to recognize a vote by Tesla investors to reinstate Musk's pay, Lentell said it signaled that Delaware judges "have become kind of activist in nature" by appearing to rewrite settled law. "I think that's where people get nervous," he said. (Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; editing by Amy Stevens, Noeleen Walder and Anna Driver )

In Tesla’s wake, more big companies propose voting “Dexit" to depart Delaware

In Tesla's wake, more big companies propose voting "Dexit" to depart Delaware By Tom Hals WILMINGTON, DEL. (Reuters) -In the c...
An Inconclusive Inflation ReportNew Foto - An Inconclusive Inflation Report

From theThe Morning Dispatchon The Dispatch Happy Wednesday!In New Zealand, it's long been known that sheep outnumber humans. But in a shocking underdog story, the humans arecatching up—we're at 4.5 sheep per New Zealander, down from 22 in 1982. It's good to see humanity getting a win these days. The U.S. willlift all sanctionson Syria, President Donald Trump announced from Saudi Arabia on Tuesday. For years, Syria—under the leadership of recently ousted dictator Bashar al-Assad—faced broad sanctions that blocked foreign investment and export revenue. Removing restrictions on the new government will give the country "a chance at greatness," Trump said, adding that the decision followed conversations with Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is expectedto meetwith Syria's new foreign minister in Turkey this week. Saudi Arabia hascommitted to investinga total of $600 billion in the United States through a variety of deals, the White House announced Tuesday. The largest of the deals is a nearly $142 billion agreement for the Gulf state topurchase"state-of-the-art warfighting equipment and services from over a dozen U.S. defense firms," which the White House described as the largest defense sales agreement in history. MBS said the investments could eventually total as much as$1 trillion, a figureequal toSaudi Arabia's entire GDP last year. U.S. companies announced new commercial partnerships with Saudi Arabia, as well, including a data center project between the Saudi company Humain and Nvidia, whichcommittedto sending 18,000 cutting-edge chips to the kingdom. Israel on Tuesdaytargeted Hamas' Gaza leader, Mohammed Sinwar, in an airstrike on a command and control center under a hospital in the southern city of Khan Younis. The Israeli militaryreportedlydiscovered that Sinwar was in the bunker the same day as the strikes, but it could take several days before Israel can determine whether the Hamas head was killed in the attack. Sinwar became the leader of Hamas in Gaza after Israeli soldierskilled his brother, Yahya Sinwar—a key architect of the October 7, 2023, attacks—last year. The Trump administration on Tuesdayannounced plansto cut an additional $450 million in grants to Harvard, on top of the $2.2 billion already frozen. The administration's task force on antisemitism sent a letter to the university stating that the school hadfailed to addressthe issues of "discrimination" and "antisemitic harassment," although it did not cite any new infractions. The move followed aletterfrom Harvard President Alan Garber to Education Secretary Linda McMahon on Monday, in which pushed back on the task force's earlier allegations and affirmed the Ivy League's commitment to rooting out antisemitism on campus. The task forcepreviously demandedsweeping changes in the university's governance, admissions, and structure—demands that Harvard has rejected—in exchange for the resumption of federal funding. The university is currentlysuingthe federal government to end the freeze. A group of Democratic attorneys general from 20 statesfiled two lawsuitsagainst the Trump administration on Tuesday, alleging that the White House threatened to withhold federal funds from the states unless they took specific immigration enforcement measures. The lawsuits claim that the Trump administration used billions of dollars for transportation, counterterrorism, and emergency preparedness as a "bargaining chip" to force states to cooperate with immigration enforcement. However, no federal funding has yet been withheld. U.S. District Judge Stephanie Hainesruled Tuesdaythat the Trump administration can use the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members. However, the administrationmust allowthe individuals 21 days to file a lawsuit challenging their removal. The order—whichappliesonly to Haines' Pennsylvania district—diverged fromdecisionsby three other federal judges, who deemed the administration's use of the authority unlawful. In April, the Supreme Courttemporarily allowedthe administration to invoke the law, provided that migrants are given the opportunity to challenge their deportations. The split among the district courts could increase pressure on the Supreme Court to resolve the issue. The consumer price index (CPI) rose 0.2 percent month-over-month and 2.3 percent annually in April, the Bureau of Labor Statisticsreported Tuesday. The increase was slightlyhigherthan March's 0.1 percent decline butlowerthan the 0.3 percent increase economists expected, as the Federal Reserve tries to bring inflation down to its 2 percent target. CPI could increase in future months, however, as analystsexpectthe effects of the tariffs to work their way through the economy and drive prices higher. "No Inflation, and Prices of Gasoline, Energy, Groceries, and practically everything else, are DOWN!!!" President Donald Trumpwroteon Tuesday, following the release of April'sconsumer price index(CPI), a key measure of inflation. Hyperbole aside, last month's inflation ratewaslower than economists expected. But some analysts believe the relatively strong report could be the final calm before the storm, as American firms brace for the impact of Trump's unpredictable trade policy. While Trump imposed a series of tariffs early in April, pauses in implementation, various climbdowns by the administration, and anticipatory buying by importers have softened their initial blow for consumers. As the Federal Reserve faces pressure to cut rates in the face of a slowing economy, it must now wait to see how much prices will rise as a result of the import taxes—and how much room it will have to boost a potentially flagging economy. According to aTuesday reportby the Bureau of Labor Statistics, CPI rose 0.2 percent month-over-month and 2.3 percent annually in April. The monthly increase was slightly higher than March's price decline of 0.1 percent, but lower than most economists' expectations of 0.3 percent. Core CPI—which excludes more volatile food and energy prices—increased0.2 percent from March and 2.8 percent annually. Aside from slight price hikes for consumer goods like furniture, there is little evidence that Americans began to feel the pain of Trump's tariffs in the month of April. The reprieve may be only temporary, however, as the duties begin to work their way through the U.S. economy. Many importers, anticipating Trump's implementation of levies on imported goods, have rushed to stockpile surplus inventory over the last several months. Apple, for example,surged flightsof Macs and iPhones to the U.S. last month, before the presidentexcludedlaptops and phones from his high tariffs on goods manufactured in China (which have now beenwalked backthemselves). In March, theU.S. imported$50 billion in pharmaceutical products, a figure that would have accounted for one-fifth of all such imports in 2024. With stockpiles almost full to bursting, U.S. firms will have breathing room before being forced to raise prices, selling from reserves of goods purchased at pre-tariff prices. "It was always a stretch to think that there would be any effect in April, and in fact, there is no effect apparent," Joseph Gagnon, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, toldTMD. Gagnon also noted that many companies are likely waiting to see whether tariffs will stick before raising prices. "They don't want to raise prices if their tariffs will come down next month," he noted. "They might just absorb one month of higher tariffs, expecting it to come back down." But other companies have already announced plans to offset some of the costs to consumers, includingRolexandMattel(it may indeed be harder tobuy 30 dollsthis Christmas!). But eventually, the U.S. could see more encompassing price hikes. "Next month, and after, you'd certainly expect the tariffs to be there," in overall price levels, Desmond Lachman, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a deputy director at the International Monetary Fund, toldTMD. Inflation, while relatively stable, is still above the Federal Reserve's 2 percent target—and tariffs are expected to raise prices further. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell warned last week that the duties could result in price hikes and other adverse economic outcomes if they're not walked back. "If the large increases in tariffs that have been announced are sustained, they are likely to generate a rise in inflation, a slowdown in economic growth, and an increase in unemployment," he said at anews conference, after announcing the Fed'sdecisionto hold interest rates steady. "All of these policies are evolving, however, and their effects on the economy remain highly uncertain." Powell was correct to note that instability remains the order of the day. The policies in question have evolved rapidly in recent weeks and even days. Over the weekend, U.S. and Chinese officials hammered out a plan to temporarily reduce tariffs between the two countries, ostensibly to create space for negotiations toward a larger trade deal. But aswe noted yesterday, tariffs, while pared back from Trump's maximalist threats, remain high: "Reciprocal" tariffs on Beijing, together with levies placed on Chinese imports in retaliation for its alleged role in the fentanyl trade, add up to a 30 percent tariff on all Chinese-made goods. It's a substantial reduction from the 145 percent tariff Trump had previously imposed, but according to aMonday reportby the Yale Budget Lab, the average tax U.S. consumers pay on imported goods still stands at 17.8 percent—the highest rate since 1934. The report also predicts a short-term increase in the price level of 1.4 percent, reducing the real income of the average household by $2,300 annually. The Fed now finds itself in a difficult position. Its "dual mandate" requires it to keep inflation stable while also maximizing employment. But if tariffs, by causing consumption to drop as prices rise, cool economic growth, the Fed's options will be limited. Cutting interest rates to maintain growth and employment runs the risk of unleashing inflation. Meanwhile, holding rates steady for too long risks suppressing growth and increases the chance of a recession. "It's a tough place for the Fed to be," Gagnon said. The extent of the slowdown is difficult to measure, due in part to the frontloading of imports in the first quarter of 2025, but economists and Fed officials expect economic growth to decelerate in the coming months. "While the latest data show a resilient economy, I expect growth this year to be slower than last," Adriana Kugler, a member of the Fed's board of governors,saidin aMonday speechat the Central Bank of Ireland. The president is aware of that risk, and has repeatedly pressed Powell to cut interest rates. "'Too Late' Jerome Powell is a FOOL, who doesn't have a clue," Trumpwrote on social medialast week, after Powell announced that the Fed would not cut rates. Following Tuesday's CPI report, Trump was back at it with Powell's new nickname: "What is wrong with Too Late Powell?"he wrote. "Not fair to America, which is ready to blossom? Just let it all happen, it will be a beautiful thing!" But Trump's comments may actually be working against his aims of convincing the Fed to lower rates and juice growth. If markets detect that a rate cut is motivated by political pressure from the president, investors could lose confidence in the Fed's ability to keep inflation relatively low and relatively predictable. Powell sought to ward off speculation on that front at last week'spress conference. It "doesn't affect our doing our job at all," he said in response to a question about whether Trump's comments changed the board of governors' decision-making processes. "We're always going to consider only the economic data, the outlook, the balance of risks, and that's it." As long as the economy's fundamentals remain fairly solid, the Fed will likely be able to sit tight and wait to act until the data is crystal clear. Historically, Gagnon noted, when faced with supply shocks like tariffs, the Fed's policy is to "look through" such one-time events and wait for price levels to work themselves out. However, if inflation ticks up or growth slows down, it will have to make a decision, mindful ofthe criticismit received in 2022 for waiting too long to raise interest rates in the face of inflation that Powell termed "transitory." Consumers expect both to happen. The University of Michigan'sconsumer sentiment indexfor April fell by 8 percent from March, with little reason to expect that the preliminary May data set to be released this Friday will look much better. While not always a direct indicator of what will soon happen in the "real economy," falling sentiment is often a predictor of scaled-back spending. Americans also expect inflation to pick up again: The New York Fed's survey ofconsumer expectations, released last week, showed that Americans predict inflation to reach 3.6 percent in a year from now, the highest level since 2022. "We think right now the appropriate thing to do is to wait and see how things evolve," Powell said last week. "There's so much uncertainty." For now, he's in a good position to do so. But reverberations from Trump's tariffs are already being felt here in the U.S.: Last week, the volume of shipments through the Port of Los Angeles, North America's busiest port, wasdown 35 percent. It may take months, but the effects of that shortage in inventory are likely to be absorbed by the American consumer. When that happens, the Fed will have to grapple with an economy that's still waiting for the other shoe to drop. Yascha Mounk Largely unnoticed by the general public on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean is a particular way America has pulled away from Europe: The average American is now vastly more affluent than the average European. The difference is not only reflected in the overall sizes of their respective economies but by the much more practical metrics of disposable income, living space, and accessibility to basic services. Despite the overwhelming evidence, though, the idea that Americans are better off than their European counterparts is an unpopular sentiment. I casually mentioned on a recent episode of Paul Krugman's interview show that, whereas both continents were similarly affluent a few decades ago, America is now nearly twice as rich as Europe. Cue a flood of outraged emails. PoliticsMay 13, 2025 Nick Catoggio Why (some) populists are mad about the latest presidential bribe. World EventsMay 14, 2025 Theo Prouvost Already grappling with surveillance and arrest warrants, reporters and outlets are also dealing with a loss of international aid. PoliticsMay 14, 2025 Jonah Goldberg Legislators have conceded too much power to the president, and judges are left to clean up the mess. Fact CheckMay 14, 2025 Peter Gattuso The nonprofit group that owns the show collects only 4 percent of its revenue from the government. PodcastMay 14, 2025 Jonah Goldberg The Industrial Revolution and its consequences. In an excerpt from their upcoming book,Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again, Jake Tapper and Alex Thompsonpulled back the curtainon former President Joe Biden's shocking mental decline. One of the most revelatory moments came at a 2024 fundraiser co-hosted by actor George Clooney. "Clooney was shaken to his core. The President hadn't recognized him, a man he had known for years. Clooney had expressed concern about Biden's health before—a White House aide had told him a few months before that they were working on getting the President to take longer steps when he walked—but obviously the problem went far beyond his gait. This was much graver," they wrote. "Clooney was certainly not the only one concerned. Other high-dollar attendees who posed for photographs with [former President Barack] Obama and Biden described Biden as slow and almost catatonic. Though they saw pockets of clarity while watching him on television, and onstage later that night, there were obvious brain freezes and clear signs of a mental slide. It was, to some of them, terrifying. Obama didn't know what to make of how his former running mate was acting. At one point, in a small group of a few dozen top donors, Biden began speaking—barely audibly—and trailed off incoherently. Obama had to jump in and preside. At other moments, during photos, Obama would hop in and finish sentences for him." New York Times: The Pope's Florida Brother, a MAGA Disciple, Plans to 'Tone It Down' NBC News: DOJ 'Weaponization' Group Will Shame Individuals It Can't Charge With Crimes, New Head Says The conservative activist named by President Donald Trump as the head of the Justice Department's "Weaponization Working Group" said Tuesday he planned to "name" and "shame" individuals the department determines it is unable to charge with crimes, in what would amount to a major departure from longstanding Justice Department protocols. … "There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people. And if they can be charged, we'll charge them. But if they can't be charged, we will name them," [Ed] Martin said. "And we will name them, and in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are ashamed. And that's a fact. That's the way things work. And so that's, that's how I believe the job operates." In the last decade, asea of action moviesinspired by—or ripping off—the hitJohn Wickfranchise have inundated Hollywood. But one of the most surprisingly fun post-Wickfilms wasNobody, the 2021 film starring Bob Odenkirk ofBetter Call Saulfame. And, after a four-year wait, Odenkirk's action hero is back for a sequel set to hit theaters in August. Do you expect to see accelerated inflation in the coming months? Read more at The Dispatch The Dispatch is a new digital media company providing engaged citizens with fact-based reporting and commentary, informed by conservative principles. Sign up for free.

An Inconclusive Inflation Report

An Inconclusive Inflation Report From theThe Morning Dispatchon The Dispatch Happy Wednesday!In New Zealand, it's long been known that s...
What to expect at RFK Jr.'s first Senate hearing as health secretaryNew Foto - What to expect at RFK Jr.'s first Senate hearing as health secretary

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy wanted an assurance fromRobert F. Kennedy Jr.before he would vote to put him in charge of the nation's $1.7 trillion health department. Kennedy's history of promoting conspiracy theories or misspeaking about vaccines alarmed Cassidy, he said duringa confirmation hearingearlier this year. So, the Louisiana senator asked: "Can I trust that that is now in the past?" Kennedy didn't give a direct answer that day. Now three months into the job, however, Kennedy's habit of casting doubts on vaccines has returned in interviews on television shows, public speeches and social media posts. Kennedy will make his first appearance as health secretary before Cassidy's powerful Senate health committee on Wednesday, when he's expected to face intense scrutiny aboutthe thousands of job he's eliminatedat the Department of Health and Human Services, the steep cuts he's made to vaccination campaigns and his response toa measles outbreakthat's sickened 1,000 people. He will speak aboutthe agency's budget requestfor the year, which includes a $500 million boost for his "Make America Healthy Again" initiative to promote nutrition and healthier lifestyles. The proposed budget also makes deep cuts, including to infectious disease prevention, maternal health and preschool programs. The secretary plans to "share his vision on how HHS' transformation will improve health outcomes, eliminate redundancies to save the American taxpayer, and streamline operations to improve efficiency and service," HHS said in a statement to The Associated Press. Kennedy's supporters, meanwhile, have viewed his first three months in the job as a successful delivery of "MAHA" agenda items: He's pressured food companies toditch artificial dyes, promised to study the cause of autism,vowed to reverse fluoride recommendationsand earned buy-in from several Republican governors to ban soda from the food stamp program, for example. But many eyes and ears will be on Kennedy's dialogue with Cassidy, who extracted a number of guarantees from Kennedy about his approach to vaccines. Those included promises to keep the current childhood vaccination schedule, use the current vaccine monitoring system and not remove statements that say vaccines do not cause autism on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. "I will watch carefully for any effort to wrongfully sow public fear about vaccines between confusing references of coincidences and anecdote," Cassidy said earlier this year, after voting in favor of Kennedy's nomination. Kennedy has since delivereda mixed messageon vaccines that public health experts have said are hampering efforts to contain the measles outbreak. He's offered endorsements of vaccinations but continued to raise questions about their efficacy or safety. He's said the childhood vaccine schedule will be examined ina study of autism's causes. He's called the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine — a shot given to children to provide immunity from all three diseases — "leaky," althoughit offers lifetime protectionfrom the measles for most people. He's also saidthey cause deaths, although none has been documented among healthy people. At the agency, too, he's made moves that support the anti-vaccine movement. He hired a man who has published research that suggests vaccines cause developmental delays to oversee a study on autism. And he's terminated some research andpublic health fundsdedicated to vaccines. Kennedy, who has rejected the anti-vaccine label, has regularly said that he is "pro-safety" and wants more research on vaccines, although decades of real-world use and research have concluded they safely prevent deadly diseases in children. "His longstanding advocacy has always focused on ensuring that vaccines, and other medical interventions, meet the highest standards of safety and are supported by gold-standard science," HHS said in a statement. "As he did during confirmation, Secretary Kennedy is prepared to address questions surrounding this topic."

What to expect at RFK Jr.'s first Senate hearing as health secretary

What to expect at RFK Jr.'s first Senate hearing as health secretary WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy wanted an assurance ...
Māori lawmakers who performed a protest haka receive temporary bans from New Zealand's ParliamentNew Foto - Māori lawmakers who performed a protest haka receive temporary bans from New Zealand's Parliament

WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — Three New Zealand lawmakers from Te Pāti Māori, the Māori Party, will receive temporary bans from Parliament and severe censure, it was announced Wednesday, over their protest of a proposed law byperforming a haka, a chanting dance of challenge, directed at their opponents. A committee of their peers recommended the penalties, understood to be the harshest ever assigned to New Zealand parliamentarians, in findings that said the trio's actions could have intimidated other legislators and were in contempt of Parliament. Their temporary suspensions are expected to be affirmed by vote during a sitting of all lawmakers on Thursday. The decision means that Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke, who at 22 is currently New Zealand's youngest lawmaker, will be suspended from Parliament for seven days. The co-leaders of her political party, Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, face 21-day bans. They won't receive salaries during their suspensions. The ruling is the latest twist in a fraught national saga over a bill,now defeated, that opponents said would reverse decades of progress for Māori, New Zealand's Indigenous people, and provoke constitutional havoc. Why were the Māori lawmakers suspended? Video of the legislators in full cry drew millions of views on social media and global news headlines last November. The bill they opposed was vanquished at a second vote in April. However, some lawmakers from the center-right government objected to the Māori Party legislators' protest during the first vote and complained to parliament's speaker. At issue was the way the trio walked across the floor of the debating chamber towards their opponents while they performed the haka. "It is not acceptable to physically approach another member on the floor of the debating chamber," Wednesday's report said, adding that the behavior could be considered intimidating. The committee denied the legislators were being punished for the haka — which is a beloved and sacred cultural institution in New Zealand life, but "the time at and manner in which it was performed" during a vote, according to the findings. The committee deciding the fate of the lawmakers is comprised of members from all political parties. The government's opponents disagreed with parts or all of the decision but were overruled. How did the suspended legislators respond? The three legislators didn't appear before the committee when summoned in April because they said New Zealand's parliament doesn't respect Māori cultural protocol and they wouldn't get a fair hearing. "The process was grossly unjust, unfair, and unwarranted, resulting in an extreme sanction," Māori party spokesperson and lawmaker Mariameno Kapa-Kingi said in a statement Wednesday. "This was not about process, this became personal." Waititi and Ngarewa-Packer, the leaders of the minor party that advocates Māori rights and holds six of Parliament's 123 seats, have for weeks lambasted the committee's process as intolerant of Māori principles and identity. The pair received more severe sanctions than Maipi-Clarke because the younger lawmaker had written a letter of "contrition" to the committee, the report said. Why did a proposed law provoke the protest? The controversial Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill sought to redefine New Zealand's founding document, the 1840 pact between the British Crown and Māori tribal leaders signed during New Zealand's colonization. The English and Māori language versions of the treaty differed and the Crown immediately began to breach both, resulting in mass land thefts and generations of disenfranchisement for Māori, who remain disadvantaged on almost every metric. But in recent decades, Māori protest movements have wrought growing recognition of the Treaty's promises in New Zealand's law, politics and public life. That produced billion-dollar land settlements with tribes and strategies to advance Indigenous language and culture. Such policies were the target of the bill, drawn up by a minor libertarian party who denounced what they said was special treatment for Māori as they tried to rewrite the treaty's promises. The bill was never expected to become law – and it didn't. But public uproar about it led to the lawmakers haka in Parliament last November. Days later, tens of thousands of New Zealandersmarched on Parliamentto oppose it in the largest race relations protest in the country's history.

Māori lawmakers who performed a protest haka receive temporary bans from New Zealand's Parliament

Māori lawmakers who performed a protest haka receive temporary bans from New Zealand's Parliament WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — Three N...
Saudi fully supports US-Iran nuclear talks, hopes for positive results, foreign minister saysNew Foto - Saudi fully supports US-Iran nuclear talks, hopes for positive results, foreign minister says

DUBAI (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia fully supports the U.S.-Iran nuclear talks and hopes for positive results, the kingdom's foreign minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud said on Wednesday. (Reporting by Nayera Abdallah and Maha El Dahan; Editing by Emelia Sithole-Matarise)

Saudi fully supports US-Iran nuclear talks, hopes for positive results, foreign minister says

Saudi fully supports US-Iran nuclear talks, hopes for positive results, foreign minister says DUBAI (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia fully supports ...

 

TEC POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com