ICE chief acknowledges 9 detainee deaths in custody, disputes Trump overspendingNew Foto - ICE chief acknowledges 9 detainee deaths in custody, disputes Trump overspending

WASHINGTON – Democratic lawmakers clashed with the head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement over funding,deaths while in federal custodyand information the agency shares with the public while in pursuit of one ofPresident Donald Trump's most high-profile second-term priorities. Rep. Lauren Underwood of Illinois, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations subcommittee on homeland security, accused the agency May 14 ofspending funds it doesn't havewhile still falling short of unrealistic deportation goals. Congress has approved funding for 41,500 detention beds but ICE is detaining 52,000 people, which could lead the agency to running out of money within two months. Underwood calledthe goal of removing 1 million people per yearan "incredibly risky strategy that sets you up for failure." More:Trump has cracked down on immigration and the border. At what cost? "This administration is cashing checks it does not have to reach questionable goals it cannot meet," Underwood said. Todd Lyons, ICE's acting director, denied the agency would run out of funding. Money could potentially be shifted from other agencies such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency or Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. Lyons said the agency's goal is to have 60,000 detention beds after the anticipated shift in funding. "ICE will not run out of money," Lyons said. Congressional oversight of ICE represented another conflict with the agency. Underwood and Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, each noted statutory language that allows lawmakers to inspect ICE detention facilities without prior announcement. "You cannot accept federal funding and shut the door on oversight," Underwood said. Ascuffle outside an ICE detention centerin New Jersey on May 9 led to the arrest of NewarkMayor Ras Barakaon a misdemeanor charge of trespassing. His arrest came as three House lawmakers – New Jersey Democratic Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman, LaMonica McIver and Rob Menendez –made an unannounced visitto inspect the privately run center called Delaney Hall. More:White House touts nearly 140,000 deportations, but data says roughly half actually deported Interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba earlier said in a social media post that Baraka trespassed and "ignored multiple warnings from Homeland Security Investigations to remove himself." Lyons said ICE staffers understand lawmakers can show up unannounced. But he asked lawmakers to provide identification and go through screening before entering the buildings. "We have nothing to hide," Lyons said. "ICE will be fully transparent." Congress has required ICE to publicly post information since 2018 when detainees die in custody. But Underwood and Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-Texas, each asked how many detainees had died since the Trump administration took office Jan. 20 because the public postings were delayed 90 days. Escobar called overcrowding and treatment in detention centers "tantamount to human rights abuses." "What we've seen under the Trump administration should send chills down the spine of every American," Escobar said. Nine detainees died in custody, Lyons said. He pledged to post information about the deaths publicly on the agency's website. "We do conduct a thorough investigation of all of those," Lyons said. The hearing comes at a time ofheightened immigration enforcement, which has led toprotestsaround the country. Border crossings have slowed to a trickle. The White House touted 140,000 deportations during Trump's first 100 days in office, althoughICE reported removingabout 57,000 during that period. ICE has arrested 88,000 people this year, two-thirds of those since Trump was inaugurated, Lyons told lawmakers. The agency's goal is to remove 1.1 million while prioritizing those convicted of crimes, he said. But lawmakers acknowledged the challenges of finding undocumented immigrants and then detaining them before deportation. "We're still prioritizing the worst of the worst," Lyons said. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:ICE chief confirms 9 detainee deaths in custody, disputes overspending

ICE chief acknowledges 9 detainee deaths in custody, disputes Trump overspending

ICE chief acknowledges 9 detainee deaths in custody, disputes Trump overspending WASHINGTON – Democratic lawmakers clashed with the head of ...
House Speaker Mike Johnson comes out in favor of a congressional stock trading banNew Foto - House Speaker Mike Johnson comes out in favor of a congressional stock trading ban

WASHINGTON – House SpeakerMike Johnsonsaid he's personally in favor of a ban on congressional stock trading, even as he said he has "sympathy" for lawmakers who argue the practice should continue. The comment comes as a bipartisan group of lawmakers have beenpushing legislationto do just that, and assomelawmakerscome under fire for trading stocks around PresidentDonald Trump's tariff announcements. "I'm in favor of that because I don't think we should have any appearance of impropriety here," Johnson told reporters on May 14. Johnson added that he has "some sympathy" for the "counterargument" members have made: Lawmakers' salaries have beenfrozen since 2009and has less purchasing power every year due to inflation. Over time, he said, "less qualified people" will be willing to run for Congress and pay the costs that come with it, like a home in Washington and in their home district, and stock trading helps them keep up. Members of Congress make $174,000 per year. It was unclear whether he would put the legislation up for a vote on the House floor. "My view is we probably should do that because I think it's been abused in the past and sadly a few bad actors discolored it for everyone," he said. "We have no tolerance for anything even resembling insider trading or any kind of advantage that people could take. Zero tolerance for it and we'll stamp it out ourselves." It's the first time Johnson has publicly weighed in on the issue. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries backed astock ban in April. Lawmakers have attempted to ban congressional stock trading for years, but each effort has eventually failed or petered out. Insider trading by members of Congress is already illegal and lawmakers are required to publicly report their stock trades. Theproposed billwould go a step further, requiring all members of Congress and their families to divest from their investments or put them into a blind trust. It currently has 72 bipartisan cosponsors, including progressive Democrats like Reps. Greg Casar, D-Texas, and Rashida Tlaib, D-Michigan, and conservative Republicans like Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and Tim Burchett, R-Tennessee. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:House Speaker Mike Johnson backs congressional stock trading ban

House Speaker Mike Johnson comes out in favor of a congressional stock trading ban

House Speaker Mike Johnson comes out in favor of a congressional stock trading ban WASHINGTON – House SpeakerMike Johnsonsaid he's perso...
What's next for Syria after Trump lifts sanctionsNew Foto - What's next for Syria after Trump lifts sanctions

The streets of Syria were a carnival of car horns, fireworks and flags afterPresident Donald Trump made the surprise announcement that the United States would lift sanctionsthat have throttled the country's economy for more than 45 years. Trump stunned even close observers on Tuesday by saying he wants to normalize relations after Syria's longtimepresident, Bashar al Assad, was toppled in December. Trump met Wednesday with Assad's successor, interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa, aformer leader of an al-Qaeda offshoot group,in Saudi Arabiaafter urging him late Tuesday to "show us something special." That has delighted Syrians and campaigners, who have been calling for sanctions relief to rebuildthe war-ruined country— a reconstruction priced up to $400 billion. When Trump made the announcement — telling a Saudi audience "we're taking them all off" — Syrian housewife Dalal Qallab took to the streets with her childrenin an outpouring of joy. "Trump said that he will give us a chance, and we deserve that chance," Qallab, a mother of four from the port city of Latakia, told NBC News. "After 14 years, I felt that the American president cared about us," she added. "It was a historic moment. It gave us hope for a better life." It's a chance at relief aftera grim 14 yearsin a country that until now has been one of the world's most sanctioned. "For years, sanctions have caused severe damage to the Syrian economy, directly impacting citizens' lives and hindering development and production," said Syrian economy minister spokesperson Hassan Al-Ahmad in a statement sent to NBC News. "This decision presents a genuine opportunity to revive the economy, restore national production cycles, and open doors to investments, technology, and markets," he added. "From the Syrian government's perspective, this decision marks a turning point that we aim to leverage wisely and rationally." "There have been very few positive things happening in Syria," said Aron Lund, a Syria expert and a fellow at Century International, a progressive think tank based in New York. "Assad going was, of course, positive in the sense thatyou got rid of this mass murderer," but the "economic morass" has persisted. Assad's 2011 crackdown morphed intoone of the most devastating and complex civil warsof modern times. Iran, Russia and Hezbollah lined up behind Assad, and the U.S., Turkey and others supported different rebel groups. Amid all of that, the Islamic State terroist organization thrived. Assad stayed in power by killing his own people, deploying chemical weapons and Russian bombs, and torturing and murdering them in an underground network of gulags. The U.N. estimates more than 300,000 people were killed; another 13 million were forced to flee their homes. In recent years, however, most international aid has flown into places like Ukraine and Gaza. Now it will be far easier for cash to enter Syria, Lund said. He called Trump's move "a big, good thing for Syria's chances of recovering and stabilizing as a functioning nation state." Such a development would be welcomed by Syria's neighbors in the Gulf and Middle East. And indeed, Trump said his decision to lift sanctions came at the behest of Saudi Arabia's Mohammed bin Salman and Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. They want to see a stable Syria, one that does not disseminate refugees, instability and terrorism, and acts as an ally against Iran. "I hope to see Syria like the UAE, Qatar or Saudi Arabia," said Nasser Eido, 49, a lawyer who fled to Norway during the war but has since returned to Damascus since Assad fell. "I'm confident we can achieve this. The old regime stole the country's resources, kept the people poor and left them hungry." Trump's move does not come without risk, however. Questions still hang over al-Sharaa, who led Assad's overthrow and says he has reformed since his days as the leader of the Islamist insurgent group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, which spearheaded the offensive against Assad in early December. He has given some moderate signals, appointing women and minorities to government positions and saying Sharia, the strict interpretation of Islamic law, will not be imposed. Yet some groups remain uneasy about their place in the new Syria, where there havealready been mass killings of Alawites, Assad's minority Muslim sect. "There is the risk that the Syrian government, which is pretty hardcore Islamist, ends up doing horrible things: more massacres, or Christians getting killed, or something else that would not play well in Washington," Lund said. The White House could be in the position of having to defend itself "against the charges that it maybe enabled that," he added. "It's not a risk free decision." In 1979, the country was blacklisted on the State Department's first list of state sponsors of terror, alongside Iraq, Libya and former South Yemen. Today, Syria is the only one left, the others being replaced by North Korea, Cuba and Iran. This classification imposes financial restrictions, as well as banning any American military-related imports or exports. More U.S. sanctions came in 2004, followed by the first measures from the United Nations and European Union a year later. In 2011, when Assad began brutally suppressing demonstrations, the U.S., U.N. and E.U. imposed further import and export controls. After rebels toppled Assad in just 11 days with little fightback, the U.S. eased some of these restrictions, granting a six-month license that allowed humanitarian aid to enter the country. Since then, the Trump administration had shown few signs of offering easy progress. It demanded that Syria fulfill a list of conditions that included protecting minorities before any sanctions could be shifted — hence the surprise at Trump's announcement. It could be a game changer for millions. Jumana Hayek, 23, risked imprisonment and torture for receiving 100 euros (around $115) every month from her brother, who had fled to Germany. "It was hard and dangerous because sending money to Syria wasn't allowed due to American and international sanctions," said Hayek, a university student from Aleppo studying electrical engineering. "My brother took risks sending the money, and we took risks receiving it," she added. "We suffered a lot, but things will change now."

What's next for Syria after Trump lifts sanctions

What's next for Syria after Trump lifts sanctions The streets of Syria were a carnival of car horns, fireworks and flags afterPresident ...
Funds from migrants sent back home help fuel some towns' economies. A GOP plan targets thatNew Foto - Funds from migrants sent back home help fuel some towns' economies. A GOP plan targets that

WASHINGTON (AP) — Israel Vail's entire life in the small western Guatemalan town of Cajolá is built off the money that his three children send home from the United States. The money from their construction jobs paid for the two-story white home where Vail now lives — and where his children, who are in the U.S. illegally, would also reside if they ever get deported. Vail, 53, invested some of the money in opening a local food shop, which he uses to keep his family afloat. In small migratory towns like Cajolá, it is not unusual for the entire economy to be built offremittances, the funds sent by migrant workers back to their home countries. "People here, they don't live luxuriously, but they live off remittances," Vail said. House Republicans have included inPresident Donald Trump'sbig priority billa 5% excise tax on remittance transfers that would cover more than 40 million people, including green card holders and nonimmigrant visa holders, such as people onH-1B, H-2A and H-2B visas. U.S. citizens would be exempt. Trump also recently announced that he is finalizing a presidential memorandum to "shut down remittances" sent by people in the U.S. illegally. White House and Treasury officials have not responded to requests for comment from The Associated Press on specifics of the presidential memorandum that Trump previewed in an April 25 Truth Social post and how it would work. Remittance experts, local leaders and former migrants say that banning, limiting or adding a tax on certain remittances could damage communities that rely on them, prove burdensome to American citizens and firms and, paradoxically, end up causing even more illegal migration to the U.S. The influx of money provides an important economic lifeline to residents of poorer towns that often have little access to jobs or income. Remittances provide opportunities for people in their home country, making it less likely they would take the risk of migrating to the United States, the experts say. "Any measure to reduce remittances will have a negative impact on the U.S. national interest," said Manuel Orozco, director of the Migration, Remittances, and Development Program at the Inter-American Dialogue. "It will have an effect on the homeland." Proponents of efforts to target remittances say they are an effective tax on people in the U.S. illegally and could be a revenue generator for the U.S. government. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for lessimmigration, acknowledges that limiting, banning or taxing remittances would make it more difficult for immigrants in the U.S. illegally. "One of the main reasons people come here is to work and send money home," Krikorian said. "If that's much more difficult to do, it becomes less appealing to come here." Legislation to control remittances — through taxes on money transfers, both internationally and domestically — has been proposed in 18 states in the past few years. Almost all of those efforts have been voted down. The exception is Oklahoma, which in 2009 passed a tax on remittances: a $5 fee on any wire transfer under $500 and 1% on any amount in excess of $500. Steven Yates, who is now a senior research fellow at the Heritage Institute, wrote for the America First Policy Institute that every state should adopt this policy as a way to combat the impact of illegal immigration. Other high-ranking Trump administration officials have also supported efforts to tighten controls on remittances. Vice President JD Vance, as an Ohio senator in 2023, co-sponsored the WIRED Act, which would have imposed a 10% fee on remittances out of the U.S. The intention of the bill — which would allow people who could prove their citizenship to get the fee back as a refundable tax credit — was "penalizing illicit activity, such as drug and human smuggling." The bill did not make it out of committee. "This legislation is a common sense solution to disincentivize illegal immigration and reduce the cartels' financial power," Vance said at the time of the bill's introduction. According to the World Bank, remittances sent to home countries in 2023 totaled about $656 billion — equivalent to the gross domestic product of Belgium. The money that Mexican migrants send home to their relatives grew by7.6% in 2023to reach a record $63.3 billion for the year. Remittances are also a major factor in the global economy, often sent from American wire services rather than banks and credit unions. India, Mexico and China are the biggest recipients of those funds, according to the World Bank. In response to the proposal to tax remittances in the new Republican House bill, Orozco said, "Some senders would find ways to send money differently, through unauthorized channels. Others would send less." "Sending less would have an impact on the receiving households, limiting the capacity to save, and in turn may increase the intention to migrate," said Orozco, who also serves as a senior fellow at Harvard University's Center for International Development. In Cajolá, local leaders say the remittance flow has stopped young people from migrating because they see economic opportunities they otherwise wouldn't have. Vail said losing that lifeline would deal a devastating blow to families like his and even cause his small business to fold. "There's a lot of fear," Vail said. "Fear that for the people that live here in Guatemala, there won't be work because the businesses will be all gone." He said his business has already been struggling since Trump took office and his sales of things like eggs, beans, sugar and more have dipped. "When Donald Trump won, many people stopped sending remittances or they began to save money," he said. "Business dropped off a lot." ___ Janetsky reported from Mexico City.

Funds from migrants sent back home help fuel some towns' economies. A GOP plan targets that

Funds from migrants sent back home help fuel some towns' economies. A GOP plan targets that WASHINGTON (AP) — Israel Vail's entire l...
California governor proposes pausing expansion of health care to low-income immigrantsNew Foto - California governor proposes pausing expansion of health care to low-income immigrants

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Gov. Gavin Newsom wants California to stop enrolling more low-income immigrants without legal status in a state-funded health care program starting in 2026 and begin charging those already enrolled a monthly premium the following year. The decision is driven by a higher-than-expected price tag on the program and economic uncertainty fromfederal tariff policies, Newsom said in a Wednesday announcement. The Democratic governor's move highlights Newsom's struggle to protect his liberal policy priorities amid budget challenges in his final years on the job. California was among one of the first statesto extend free health care benefitsto all poor adults regardless of their immigration status last year, an ambitious plan touted by Newsom to help the nation's most populous state to inch closer to a goal of universal health care. But the cost for such expansion ran $2.7 billion more than the administration had anticipated. Newsom in March suggested to reporters he was not considering rolling back health benefits for low-income people living in the country illegally as the state was grappling witha $6.2 billion Medicaid shortfall. He also repeatedly defended the expansion, saying it saves the state money in the long run. The program is state-funded and does not use federal dollars. Under the plan, the changes won't impact children Under Newsom's plan, low-income adults without legal status will no longer be eligible to apply for Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program, starting in 2026. Those who are already enrolled won't be kicked off their plans because of the enrollment freeze, and the changes won't impact children. Newsom's office didn't say how long the freeze would last. Starting in 2027, adults with "unsatisfactory immigration status" on Medi-Cal, including those without legal status and those who have legal status but aren't eligible for federally funded Medicaid, will also have to pay a $100 monthly premium. The governor's office said that is in line with the average cost paid by those who are on subsidized heath plans through California's own marketplace. There's no premium for most people currently on Medi-Cal. In total, Newsom's office estimated the changes will save the state $5.4 billion by 2028-2029. "The state must take difficult but necessary steps to ensure fiscal stability and preserve the long-term viability of Medi-Cal for all Californians," his office said in an announcement. The Medi-Cal expansion, combined with other factors such as rising pharmacy costs and larger enrollment by older people, it has forced California to borrow andauthorize new fundingto plug the multibillion hole earlier this year. California provides free health care to more than a third of its 39 million people. Wildfires, tariff policies and health costs strain California's budget The proposals come ahead of Newsom's scheduled presentation on the updated budget.Recovery from the Los Angeles wildfires, changing federal tariff policies and the expensive health care expansion are putting a strain on California's massive state budget. Lawmakers are expecting a multibillion dollar shortfall this year and more deficits projected for several years ahead. Newsom is expected to blamePresident Donald Trump's tariff policies for the shortfalls, estimating that the polices have cost the state $16 billion in tax revenues. California is also bracing for major budget hits if Republicans in Congress follow through witha plan to slash billions of dollars in Medicaidand penalize states for providing health care toimmigrantswithout legal status. Newsom now opens budget negotiations with lawmakers and it's unclear how Democrats who control the Legislature will react to his plan to freeze new Medi-Cal enrollment for some immigrants. A final budget proposal must be signed by June. California's budget is by far the largest among states. "This is going to be a very challenging budget," Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, who chairs the budget committee, said before Newsom's proposals were announced. "We're going to have to make some tough decisions." The budget proposals presented this week will build in some of the impacts from federal policies, but many unknowns remain. California could face bigger budget deficits in coming years The governor already said he's planning to scale back on baseline spending this year. Analysts and economists also warn that California will face bigger deficits in the tens of billions of dollars in coming years due to economic sluggishness and stock market volatility brought on by the tariff war. The budget Newsom first proposed in January included little new spending. But it allows the state to fully implement the country's first universaltransitional kindergarten programand increase the state's film and TV tax credit to $750 million annually to bring back Hollywood jobs that have gone to New York and Georgia. He recently called on Trump to pass a $7.5 billion film tax credit at the federal level. Last year, Newsom and the Legislature agreed to dip into the state's rainy day fund, slash spending — including a nearly 10% cut for nearly all state departments — and temporarily raise taxes on some businesses to close an estimated $46.8 billion budget deficit.

California governor proposes pausing expansion of health care to low-income immigrants

California governor proposes pausing expansion of health care to low-income immigrants SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Gov. Gavin Newsom wants Cal...

 

TEC POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com