Hasan Piker's CBP Detention Marks Another Trump-Era Attack on Free SpeechNew Foto - Hasan Piker's CBP Detention Marks Another Trump-Era Attack on Free Speech

Hasan Piker, a Turkish-American online streamer with 4.6 million followers across Twitch and YouTube, was detained by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) upon reentering the United States at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago earlier this week. Piker believes he was targeted for expressing support for Hamas and criticizing President Donald Trump on his livestreaming platforms. Pikersaidhe was returning from a trip to France throughGlobal Entry—a security check program available to low-risk citizens—when he was asked to "step aside" by CBP. He was then taken to a detention area within the airport and later questioned by a CBP agent regarding his opinions on Trump, Hamas, and his choice of interview guests. After two hours of detainment, he was released and allowed to enter the country. Pikerdiscussedthe incident on a Twitch stream, saying he believes it was an attempt to create a chilling effect on those who speak out against the Trump administration. "They straight up tried to get something out of me that they could use to basically detain me permanently," he said. According to Piker, the CBP agent "kept saying stuff like, 'Do you like Hamas?' 'Do you support Hamas?' 'Do you think Hamas is a terror group or a resistance group?'" To which Piker replied, "I'm on the side of civilians. I want the endless bloodshed to end. I am a pacifist. I want the wars to end." Piker wasn't completely surprised by this turn of events, given that political activists and commentators challenging the Trump administration's policies on Israel are experiencing increased scrutiny. "The reason they're doing this is to try to create an environment of fear, to try to get people like myself, or others who would be in my shoes that don't have the same level of security, to shut the fuck up,"saidPiker. "I think they detained me because they know who the fuck I am and they wanted to put the fear of God into me, not knowing that I'm a stubborn piece of shit and that's not going to work at all," Piker added. Tricia McLaughlin, spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), made astatementon X regarding Piker's detainment: "Lying for 'likes.' Claims that his political beliefs triggered the inspection are baseless." She claimed that CBP officers are "following the law, not agendas." This isn't the first time the Trump administration has gone after people for constitutionally protected speech. Since coming into office, the president has issued 18 executive orders implicating First Amendment rights, and "many target expression based on viewpoint—a quintessential violation of the First Amendment,"accordingto the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. These orders give enforcement powers to 20 separate federal agencies, including the DHS, and are "aimed at punishing enemies for speech, imposing governmental orthodoxy regarding race, gender, and other matters, and controlling the distribution of information." These agency powers are being used. One example isRumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University graduate student, who was arrested on March 25 after the DHS claimed she was "engaged in activities in support of Hamas, a foreign terrorist organization that relishes the killing of Americans." Ozturk, who holds a student visa and is not an American citizen, was held for more than six weeks before a federal judge ordered her immediate release. The judge said Ozturk's arrest raised serious due process and First Amendment concerns, and her continued detention "potentially chills the speech of millions and millions of people in this country who are not citizens." But Americans' speech is also under threat—including Piker's, who is using hisplatformto push for strong First Amendment protections. "Nothing I have done online is illegal as of now. Laws may change in the future, and they might actually start prosecuting speech, which I do fear is the goal of this administration. But so far, everything I've done is fully protected under the First Amendment," Piker said. The postHasan Piker's CBP Detention Marks Another Trump-Era Attack on Free Speechappeared first onReason.com.

Hasan Piker's CBP Detention Marks Another Trump-Era Attack on Free Speech

Hasan Piker's CBP Detention Marks Another Trump-Era Attack on Free Speech Hasan Piker, a Turkish-American online streamer with 4.6 milli...
Palestinians mark Nakba day as fears of displacement growNew Foto - Palestinians mark Nakba day as fears of displacement grow

By Hussam al-Masri and James Mackenzie GAZA/JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Palestinians marked Nakba day on Thursday, commemorating the loss of their land after the 1948 war at the birth of the state of Israel, as Israeli military operations in Gaza and the occupied West Bank have again displaced hundreds of thousands. The Nakba, or "catastrophe", has been one of the defining experiences for Palestinians for more than 75 years, helping to shape their national identity and casting its shadow on their conflicted relationship with Israel ever since. The resonance has been amplified by the war in Gaza and the Israeli army's months-long campaign in West Bank refugee camps, where hundreds of thousands of descendants of Palestinians who lost their homes in 1948 have lived for decades. The war has destroyed large swathes of Gaza and forced most of the more than 2 million people who live there to move multiple times, clinging on in tents or bombed-out houses and other makeshift shelters. "During all the wars that there have been, there has been nothing like what happened during this war," said Badryeh Mohareb, who lived through the Nakba as a child, when her family fled their home in the seaside city of Jaffa, near Tel Aviv to come to Gaza. The May 15 Nakba day commemoration marks the start of the 1948 war, when neighbouring Arab states attacked Israel a day after the new state declared its independence following the withdrawal of British forces from what was then called Palestine. The fighting lasted for months and cost thousands of lives, with more than 700,000 Palestinians fleeing their homes or driven away from villages in what is now Israel, most into makeshift camps like the ones now occupied by the displaced of Gaza. Sitting in front of the ruins of her house in the southern city of Khan Younis, where she moved after she was married, she said two of her grandchildren had been killed and everything she had was lost. "People are destroyed," she said. Israel's campaign in Gaza, launched in retaliation for the devastating Hamas attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023 has been one of the longest, and certainly the most bloody in its history, leaving much of the Gaza Strip barely habitable. Hardliners in the government, encouraged by U.S. President Donald Trump's plan for a Gaza emptied of its Palestinian population and converted into a beachside resort, have spoken openly about seizing the entire enclave. After a two-month truce, Israel resumed its operation in Gaza in March, squeezing the population into an ever-narrowing area against the coast and in the area around Khan Younis as its forces have pressed in from the border zones. According to the UN humanitarian agency OCHA, 70% of Gaza is now within the no-go areas set up along the edges of the enclave or in areas under displacement orders by the military and more than 436,000 people have been displaced since March. WEST BANK In the West Bank too, Palestinians have been facing growing pressure as Israeli settler violence and the military operations in northern cities like Jenin and Tulkarm have forced tens of thousands from their homes. "I only took two outfits with me, hoping that it would last for two, three or four days," said Mustafa Abu Awwad, an 88-year-old Palestinian, as he described his hurried departure from the Nur Shams refugee camp near Tulkarm in January. "I move from one area to another... every week or 10 days we move from place to another." The military moved into the area in January, in a large-scale operation it said was aimed at rooting out militant groups that had become entrenched in refugee camps that have developed into crowded urban townships. The military has remained ever since, in the longest operation the West Bank has seen since the second Intifada uprising two decades ago, systematically destroying houses, roads and infrastructure. According to United Nations figures more than 40,000 people in the West Bank have been displaced since the start of the operation, a situation OCHA says could amount to forcible transfer, defined as a crime against humanity by the International Criminal Court. Stripped of their inhabitants, the camps in Jenin and Tulkarm have been reduced to ghost towns with no functioning power, water or other infrastructure, making it increasingly difficult for anyone to return. (Additional reporting by Raneen Sawafta; Editing by Alexandra Hudson)

Palestinians mark Nakba day as fears of displacement grow

Palestinians mark Nakba day as fears of displacement grow By Hussam al-Masri and James Mackenzie GAZA/JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Palestinians ma...
US Supreme Court revives lawsuit against cop in fatal Houston shootingNew Foto - US Supreme Court revives lawsuit against cop in fatal Houston shooting

By Andrew Chung WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court revived on Thursday a Texas woman's civil rights lawsuit against a Houston police officer who fatally shot her son during a traffic stop. The justices, in a 9-0 ruling, threw out a lower court's dismissal of the lawsuit by Janice Hughes accusing the officer, Roberto Felix Jr., of violating the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures by using deadly force against her son. Ashtian Barnes, 24, was killed in the 2016 incident. The case tested whether lower courts should analyze police conduct by considering only the exact "moment of threat" to the officer, while excluding the officer's actions prior to the deadly episode - even by a few seconds. Lower courts found that Felix's actions were reasonable, as they considered only the two seconds before the officer fired his first shot, when he was hanging onto the moving vehicle and believed his life was in danger. The "moment of threat" doctrine is used by courts in several regions of the country, including the Texas federal courts overseen by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where this case was decided - but not in other federal courts, according to lawyers for Hughes. Hughes sued the officer and Harris County, seeking monetary damages. A trial judge and then the 5th Circuit ruled against Hughes. Felix, a Harris County Constable's Office traffic enforcement officer, pulled Barnes over on April 28, 2016, because the rented Toyota Corolla he was driving on a Houston highway had outstanding toll violations. Barnes searched for his license and proof of insurance, and suggested they might be in the trunk, according to court papers. Felix claimed to smell marijuana, though no evidence of drugs was found in the car, the filings showed. Felix ordered Barnes out of the vehicle, but instead the car began to move forward, according to court papers. Felix stepped on to the driver's door sill and shouted at Barnes not to move, then fired twice, the filings showed. Barnes died at the scene. Local officials investigated the shooting but Felix was never charged with a crime. An internal police probe also cleared Felix of any wrongdoing, according to court papers. The lawsuit alleged that the shooting resulted from Felix's dangerous decision "to pull his gun without provocation, then point that gun in Ashtian Barnes' direction, then leaping onto a moving vehicle and firing twice into it without warning, with no clue as to what he was aiming at." Lawyers for Felix had argued against a ruling that would make it harder for police to defend their use of force - even if an officer made a mistake, used bad tactics or had poor planning. During arguments before the Supreme Court in January, the justices seemed skeptical of the "moment of threat" doctrine, while some worried that a ruling against Felix would deter police from doing their jobs. Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch noted during the arguments that, even if courts may look at the totality of the circumstances of an incident involving police, officers are still protected by a powerful legal defense called qualified immunity. (Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Editing by Will Dunham)

US Supreme Court revives lawsuit against cop in fatal Houston shooting

US Supreme Court revives lawsuit against cop in fatal Houston shooting By Andrew Chung WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court revive...
Trump's Middle East tour has more substance than the White House let onNew Foto - Trump's Middle East tour has more substance than the White House let on

There's more to Donald Trump's Middle East trip than billion-dollar contracts, parades of camels and astorm back homeover Qatar's offer to give the presidenta new Air Force One. A tour narrowly billed by the White House as a chance for Trump to show he's a master dealmaker is jumblingthe region's geopolitical jigsawpuzzle. Wherever he goes, Trump brings disruption that can forge possibilities. And he takes risks – for instance, his decision on this trip tolift sanctions on Syriato give a war-ravaged nation a second chance. But the move revives a perennial question about Trump's entire foreign and trade policy. Can he apply himself sufficiently to reach genuine breakthroughs from openings he creates? The White House's obsession with lionizing Trump means his most significant initiatives are often swamped by hype. So a deal for Qatar to buy Boeing jets worthtens of billions of dollarsgot more attention back home Wednesday than his encounter in Riyadh with Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa. The historic first meeting between US and Syrian leaders in 25 years could be the signature initiative of Trump's tour. Before he overthrew the murderous dictator Bashar al-Assad, al-Sharaa wasa rebel leaderwhopledged allegianceto al Qaeda and had a $10 million US bounty on his head. Yet Trump sat with him and lifted US sanctions on his civil war-wracked country, hoping to give it a chance to unify and rescue civilians facing severe hunger. Trump's geopolitical shake-up doesn't end in Syria. He's used the trip to build newpressure on Iranto agree to restrictions on its nuclear program – warning of military action if it refuses but clearly trying to head off the dire prospect of a new Middle East war. His journey has also highlighted growing daylight with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – who was seen as an ideological soulmate of the 47th president but who is increasingly an object of Trump's frustration. Behind the scenes, Trump's team has been talking with Qatari and Saudi officials about how to alleviate a humanitarian crisis in Gaza caused by Israel's blockade and an onslaught that has killedtens of thousands of civilians. Netanyahu's response has been to declare he has "no choice" but to keep fighting, and he targeted the Hamas leader who'd be needed for any peace talks, in astrike on a hospital. There's no sense that the US alliance with Israel is at risk. But gaps between Trump and Netanyahu have also opened over aUS pact to halt rocket attacks by Houthi rebelsin Yemen that did not include Israel; Trump's bypassing of the Israelis in a deal this week tofree the last living American hostage in Gaza; and on the Syria sanctions decision. Trump was not solely focused on the Middle East in recent days. He'd alsohoped to fly to Turkeyfor a startling photo-op with Presidents Vladimir Putin of Russia and Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine that would have validated his thus far unsuccessful attempt to end their war. Neither rival leader is likely to show up to Thursday's talks, prompting Trump to abandon his plans for an unexpected side trip and casting further doubt on his peace initiative. Trump's decision to lift sanctions on Syria represents one of the biggest foreign policy gambles so far in his second term. Details of the intricate diplomacy that must have led up to this decision have not yet been revealed. But the move reflects an understanding that Syria, devastated by years of civil war, is at a turning point, occupies a vital place on the map of the region and has the potential to tip into greater chaos if it deteriorates further. The president told reporters that he believed that al-Sharaa has "got a real shot at holding it together." Officials said later that Trump wants Syria to eventually recognize Israel. This would represent an extraordinary transformation in a region wracked by hate. Firas Maksad, director of outreach at the Middle East Institute, told CNN's Becky Anderson that the Syria move was a significant win for Trump on a trip dominated by economic concerns. "I think Trump has been very careful and very, I would say, keen on unlocking geopolitical successes, too," Maksad said. "Whatever happens in Syria doesn't stay in Syria." The president's move mirrors a willingness of some European and Middle Eastern leaders to shelve distaste for al-Sharaa's past activity in the hope he can stop a return to civil war. Unusually, a Trump policy decision is winning praise even among some longtime critics. "I think it's a good move," Leon Panetta, a former CIA director and US defense secretary, told "CNN News Central" on Wednesday. "I think that (Trump) is right because this individual was able to lead that rebellion, was able to depose Assad and, as far as I can see, is working to try to stabilize a difficult challenge with regards to Syria." Trump's decision to lift sanctions came at the urging of Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which both want to avoid unrest in Syria spreading. There is also a desire in Riyadh, Washington and Doha to prevent a return of outside powers to Syria, which has endured decades of foreign interference from states including Iran, Russia, Turkey and Israel. But Trump is taking a risk. While al-Sharaa is seen outside the country as Syria's best hope for stability, concern is growing that his government is not protecting religious and ethnic minorities. In Washington, meanwhile, senior members of Congress will want assurances that he's driving out ISIS elements before they agree to lift sanctions enshrined in law that the president cannot waive on his own. "To seize the moment, it will be important for the President's decision to be swiftly implemented and for the Syrian government to move quickly to address U.S. national security concerns," Sens. Jim Risch and Jeanne Shaheen, the Republican chairman and the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement. "This will help Syria remain on the path to freedom from the malign influence of Iran and Russia, from China's attempt to gain an economic foothold in the Middle East, and from the resurgence of ISIS." South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Trump ally, struck a note of caution. "I am very inclined to support sanctions relief for Syria under the right conditions," Graham said in a statement released from Turkey. "However, we must remember that the current leadership in Syria achieved its position through force of arms, not through the will of its people." Graham noted that Israel was especially concerned by the decision to lift sanctions on Syria and argued that the US must work together with allies to coordinate the new opening. "This newly formed government in Syria may be a good investment and could be the pathway to unifying Syria, making it a stable part of the region. However, there is a lot that must be learned before making that determination," Graham said. "A stable Syria would be a game changer for the region, but given its past, their progress must be evaluated closely." If Trump is to shepherd Syria toward stability, he'll need to use the power of the United States to convene like-minded nations. This kind of work with allies is hardly a hallmark of this White House. And it's another challenge for a stretched foreign policy team hampered by chaotic staffing decisions and the inexperience of some key players – for instance, Trump's envoy for all occasions Steve Witkoff. Trump already seemed to be laying the groundwork for the laying of blame, should his decision backfire, noting several times that part of his reason for lifting sanctions was because of the advocacy of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. "Oh, what I do for the crown prince," Trump said. Some of Trump's recent wins hardly suggest he's ready to do the hard work of diplomacy. He claimed he reached big trade deals with the UK and China. But they'd be better described as announcements of an intent to reach agreements. If Tuesday's sanctions move is similar, his Syria diplomacy will never reach its goals. There's another reason for anxiety. Al-Sharaa seems to have activated Trump's weakness for strongmen. He described the former terrorist as a "great young attractive guy" and a "fighter." Jarringly, given the Syrian leader's al Qaeda associations, the president commented that he had "a very strong past." History is full of examples in which Washington put its trust in Middle East tough-guy leaders to keep countries torn by religious and tribal divides in one piece. In Iraq, such a bet ended up costing thousands of US lives. But Trump is more optimistic. "It's their time to shine," he said. "Good luck, Syria. Show something very special." For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Trump’s Middle East tour has more substance than the White House let on

Trump's Middle East tour has more substance than the White House let on There's more to Donald Trump's Middle East trip than bil...
Trump says he would go to Russia-Ukraine talks 'if it is appropriate'New Foto - Trump says he would go to Russia-Ukraine talks 'if it is appropriate'

DUBAI (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Thursday he would go to Russia-Ukraine talks in Turkey on Friday "if it is appropriate". "I was thinking about going, but it is very tough... If something happened I would go on Friday if it was appropriate," Trump told a business breakfast in Doha on a tour of the Gulf. "But we have people right now negotiating, I just hope Russia and Ukraine are able to do something. It has to stop." (Reporting by Nayera Abdallah, Editing by Michael Georgy and Alex Richardson)

Trump says he would go to Russia-Ukraine talks 'if it is appropriate'

Trump says he would go to Russia-Ukraine talks 'if it is appropriate' DUBAI (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Thursday...

 

TEC POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com