United by music, divided on Israel: Eurovision tensions bubble up in SwitzerlandNew Foto - United by music, divided on Israel: Eurovision tensions bubble up in Switzerland

BASEL, Switzerland — As tourists crossed Basel's Mittlere Brücke bridge Thursday, some of them paused to savor the warm spring sun just as they have done for centuries. This week, the crossing that straddles the Rhine river as it meanders across the borders with nearby France and Germany was lined with flags bearing theEurovision Song Contestslogan, "United by Music." Basel, and Europe at large, are anything but united. Police and the the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) are preparing themselves for a potential repeat oflast year's iteration of Eurovision, the song competition that launched the careers of ABBA and 1988 winner Celine Dion. The 2024 contest was overshadowed by politics perhaps more than in any previous year, with fierce protests over the participation of Israel amid itsgovernment's intensifying war on Gaza. It's purely by chance that this year's contest, usually an outrageous jamboree of inscrutable lyrics and scantily clad backing dancers, is being held in a country with a long-standing policy of neutrality. Each year's venue is dictated by the nationality of last year's winner. The EBU, which organizes the contest, says the event is nonpolitical, but given that it brings together dozens of countries — this year, 37 nations will take part — thedivisions and flashpointspresent on the world stage inevitably creep in among the pyrotechnic reveling. Thepolitical divide over Israel'sparticipation in Basel has already tested the EBU's impartiality. Israelshattered a fragile two-month ceasefireearlier this year, as its militaryintensifies its bombardment of the Gaza Stripand enforcesa total blockade of food, medicine and goodsfrom entering the enclave, where more than50,000 people have been killed, according to Gaza health officials. The war began following the Hamas-led terror attacks on several sites in Israel onOct. 7, 2023, that killed around 1,200 people. One of those sites was theNova music festival, where around 360 people were killed. The singer representing Israel, which first took part in the contest in 1973, is Yuval Raphael — one of the survivors of that attack. Last year, Raphael spoke to the United Nations Human Rights Council, describing how she sought refuge in a bomb shelter with other festivalgoers, hiding for eight hours under dead bodies. She told the U.N., "the physical injuries I sustained are healing, but the mental scars will stay with me forever." The EBU bars lyrics it views as political and last year forced Israel's entry to change lyrics that referenced the Oct. 7 attacks. While the lyrics of this year's song, "New Day Will Rise," don't make reference to any events in particular, Galia Press-Barnathan, a professor of international relations at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, says the message is nevertheless clear. "You can't ban a personal story from a competition," she told NBC News in a Zoom interview earlier this month. "So you really get two for one," she said, with a talented singer performing what sounds like "an old French chanson" paired with a story that makes clear the song is actually about "both a personal trauma and a national trauma, and how you sort of come out of this." But much as Israel takes part in various European sports leagues, its inclusion in Eurovision is an example of the Middle Eastern nation viewing itself as part of the European cultural community, an idea that Press-Barnathan says is an important "part of the Israeli societal imagination." On Wednesday evening in central Basel, some 200 protesters demanded Israel be expelled from Eurovision and for an end to the Israeli offensive in Gaza. The crowd, some wearing Palestinian flags, marched in silence down a street ringing with music, The Associated Press reported. For many critics, Israel's inclusion in Eurovision is tantamount to accepting its military campaign, which has prompted the International Criminal Court to issue an arrest warrant for Israeli leaders for "crimes against humanity and war crimes," charges that Israel denies. Those pushing for the country to be kicked out of the contest — much as Russia was following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 — include former participants, more than 70 of whom signed a joint letter earlier this month. "It should be a happy occasion that Eurovision is finally in Switzerland, but it's not," Lea Kobler, a protester from Zurich in Basel, told the AP. "How can we rightfully exclude Russia but we're still welcoming Israel?" Participation in Eurovision has long pushed the geographical boundaries of Europe itself. While the contest started with seven countries in 1956, it has vastly expanded and now includes not only Israel, but countries like Georgia, Azerbaijan and even Australia. Around the edges of last year's festival in Malmö, Sweden, protests against Israel's participation reached a fever pitch. Police scuffled with pro-Palestinian protesters who tried to make themselves heard over the pop music blaring outside the stadium as fans lined up to enter. This year in Basel, demonstrators were highly visible at the opening ceremony of the contest, with large Palestinian flags being waved in the crowd. There were some boos for Raphael as she walked the carpet, and Israel's X account posted a video of a pro-Palestinian protester making a throat-slitting gesture at the Israeli delegation. Brigitte Vogel, a spokesperson for the police in Basel, told NBC News in an emailed statement, "The Cantonal Police is aware of the incident and will draw up a report for the responsible prosecution authorities." "By continuing to platform the representation of the Israeli state, the EBU is normalising and whitewashing its crimes," the letter reads. "The EBU has already demonstrated that it is capable of taking measures, as in 2022, when it expelled Russia from the competition. We don't accept this double standard regarding Israel." Some participating national broadcasters, including those from Spain, Iceland and Slovenia, have also questioned whether Israel should take part. Senior leadership from the Irish broadcaster RTÉ last week met with the EBU to raise its own concerns. In an emailed statement, the EBU said it "will continue to listen to all members. As we did in 2024, we will have a broader discussion when the Contest concludes with all participating broadcasters to reflect on all aspects of this year's event." More protests are expected when Israel competes in Thursday's semifinal. Participation amid criticism, Press-Barnathan says, is a way for Israel to fight against its detractors. "It's the pushback against criticism, delegitimization, all that stuff." And for a domestic audience, she said, it's a way of saying, "We're still here. You know, we're not going anywhere." Meanwhile, the Swiss hosts may just be hoping that by their refusal to take sides, the contest goes off without too much controversy.

United by music, divided on Israel: Eurovision tensions bubble up in Switzerland

United by music, divided on Israel: Eurovision tensions bubble up in Switzerland BASEL, Switzerland — As tourists crossed Basel's Mittle...
Countries in the Americas grant birthright citizenship. What happens if they revoke it?New Foto - Countries in the Americas grant birthright citizenship. What happens if they revoke it?

A presidential executive orderrestricting automatic citizenshipfor children born to some immigrants could reverse a right granted to everyone born in the United States for the past 157 years – a right granted by all but two countries in the Americas. On May 15,the Supreme Court heard argumentsover whether to letPresident Donald Trump's Jan. 20 orderto take effect nationwide as legal challenges wind their way through the courts. The right to automatic U.S. citizenship at birth was enshrined by the14th Amendment, ratified in 1868 in the wake of the Civil War. It granted full citizenship to formerly enslaved people and their children, and ensured everyone born in the United States could claim citizenship regardless of race; legal rulings eventually cemented the right for the U.S.-born children of immigrants, too. "The aim of the Amendment was to eliminate the existence of a class of people who were subjected to American law, but excluded from American legal rights," according to a report by the American Immigration Council, which advocates for immigrant rights. Some European, Asian and African countries restrict citizenship on the basis of ancestry, parentage or residency. Many still do today including Spain, France, Italy and Germany; India, Iran and Pakistan; South Africa, Sudan, Egypt and others. Citizenship to a baby born in those countries can depend on questions like whether their parents are citizens, for example. Countries in the Americas – built by colonization and immigration – eventually followed the example of the United States, providing birthright citizenship to all. Today, 33 nations in the Western Hemisphere – all except Colombia and the Dominican Republic – provide birthright citizenship to anyone born within their borders, according to World Population Reviewmap of birthright citizenshiparound the globe. Amid a rise of anti-immigrant sentiment, Trump has questioned automatic citizenship for the children of immigrants here illegally, or for those born to foreign nationals in the U.S. legally on a visa. The president's executive order would require at least one parent to possess U.S. citizenship or legal permanent residency in order for their U.S.-born child to gain citizenship. The Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for immigration restrictions, estimated there were between 225,000 to 250,000 births to immigrants in the country without authorization in 2023, or roughly 7% of births that year. Bucking the majority in the Americas, the Dominican Republic decided in 2013 to restrict birthright citizenship in a way that disenfranchised children born to Haitian migrant workers. Haiti and the Dominican Republic share the island of Hispaniola, and Haitians have long migrated across the border to work in the Dominican Republic's more prosperous economy. The border region had long been fraught with racial and ethnic tensions,that in the past turned deadly. But the revocation of birthright citizenship from the children of Haitian immigrants – retroactive to 1929 – lefthundreds of thousands of people statelessovernight, according to the Center for Migration Studies in New York, which advocates for immigrant rights. The Dominican Republicdeported hundreds of thousands of peoplewho had been born there and saw their citizenship disappear. More than a decade later, tens of thousands of people born in the Dominican Republic to Haitian parents have no way to enroll in school, work legally, marry or get a birth certificate for their children. The same could happen to children born in the U.S. to parents who aren't citizens or lack legal status, should Trump's executive order take effect. However, Trump's order is not written to be retroactive. TheSupreme Courtjustices wrestled with whether to let Trump broadly enforce his restrictions on birthright citizenship as lower courts consider whether those changes are constitutional. During the May 15 hearing, justices asked attorneys for both sides about the consequences of allowing the order to take effect. The Trump administrationarguestheexecutive ordershould only be paused for the people challenging it and should not be subject to a nationwide injunction putting it on hold. Justice Elena Kagan said whether some states could become magnets for pregnant migrants to give birth, should the high court let the order take effect for some, would create a patchwork of citizenship policies among states. "It strikes me as completely obvious," Kagan said, that migrants would seek to give birth in states where U.S. citizenship was afforded. New Jersey solicitor general Jeremy Feigenbaum told justices that letting Trump's order go into effect would produce "unprecedented chaos." "We genuinely don't know how this could possibly work on the ground," he said. Bart Jansen and Maureen Groppe contributed. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:What birthright citizenship looks like around the world

Countries in the Americas grant birthright citizenship. What happens if they revoke it?

Countries in the Americas grant birthright citizenship. What happens if they revoke it? A presidential executive orderrestricting automatic ...
Trump chides Apple CEO Tim Cook for moving iPhone production to India instead of U.S.New Foto - Trump chides Apple CEO Tim Cook for moving iPhone production to India instead of U.S.

WASHINGTON − PresidentDonald Trumpsaid he chided Apple CEO Tim Cook for moving iPhone production from China to India rather than the United States. "I had a little problem with Tim Cook yesterday," Trump said during a trip to Qatar. More:Tanks, cannons and soldiers sleeping in DC offices: Inside Trump birthday military parade Calling him a friend, Trump said he told Cook, "'I treated you very good...But now I hear you'rebuilding all over India.'" "'We are not interested in you building in India, India can take care of themselves, they are doing very well, we want you to build here,'" Trump says he told the businessman. Apple has been moving productionof iPhonessold in the United States from China to India and said it would speed up the process as it seeks to avoid thehigh tariffsTrump's administration put on Beijing. A steep145% tariff on imports from Chinawas temporarily lowered to 30% this week as the two nations attempt to work out a longer term deal. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Contributing: Reuters,Jessica Guynn This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump says he confronted Apple's Tim Cook over iPhone production

Trump chides Apple CEO Tim Cook for moving iPhone production to India instead of U.S.

Trump chides Apple CEO Tim Cook for moving iPhone production to India instead of U.S. WASHINGTON − PresidentDonald Trumpsaid he chided Apple...
Newark mayor's lawyers to seek dismissal of trespass charge, say arrest was targetedNew Foto - Newark mayor's lawyers to seek dismissal of trespass charge, say arrest was targeted

By Karen Freifeld NEWARK, New Jersey (Reuters) -Lawyers for Newark, New Jersey Mayor Ras Baraka said on Thursday they would file motions to dismiss a charge that he had trespassed at a privately run federal immigration detention center there last week. Baraka, who is running for the Democratic nomination for governor in a crowded field, faces a misdemeanor charge of trespassing at Delaney Hall, an offense that carries a maximum penalty of 30 days in jail. During the status conference in New Jersey federal court, the mayor's counsel said they would seek dismissal on grounds that President Donald Trump's Republican administration had selectively prosecuted the Democratic mayor. The lawyers also said the mayor was not subject to federal jurisdiction when arrested. The defense plans to file the motions next month. "We believe that the mayor himself was targeted here," said Rahul Agarwal, one of three lawyers at the defense table. He said videos support the position that Baraka did not commit a crime. "The mayor was invited into the facility on Friday," Agarwal said, and was "outside the facility when he was ultimately handcuffed and detained." The arrest of Baraka, mayor of New Jersey's largest city, is emblematic of the aggressive stance the Trump administration has taken against officials who resist its immigration crackdown. According to the criminal complaint, Baraka unlawfully entered and remained in the Delaney Hall facility, run by GEO Group Inc under contract with the federal government. "We believe there's clear evidence that the mayor was within the property," Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephen Demanovich told U.S. Magistrate Judge Andre Espinosa, who said a trial could take place in late July, without setting a specific date. During the conference, the prosecutor conferred with Alina Habba, interim U.S. attorney for New Jersey, who sat in the well of the courtroom. Last week, Habba said on the X social media platform that Baraka had "committed trespass and ignored multiple warnings" to leave the facility. "No one is above the law," she wrote in capital letters. Also last week on Fox News, Habba accused Baraka of "grandstanding." The hearing took place on the same day as a Wisconsin county judge was scheduled to appear in federal court on charges she had helped a migrant evade an immigration arrest in her courtroom. In Newark, the judge asked the defense lawyer if the mayor was the only person arrested in the incident, which unfolded while three Democratic members of Congress were conducting an unannounced inspection of the center. "He was," answered Agarwal. A crowd of about 200 supporters rallied outside the courthouse after Thursday's court session. Some protesters carried signs reading "Protect Immigrant Rights and Due Process" and "Close Delaney Hall." Amol Sinha, executive director of the ACLU of New Jersey, was among those outside court, and said Baraka's arrest was egregious. "It is an intimidation tactic to bully those who won't do the Trump administration's bidding." Sinha noted that Trump has vowed to go after officials in sanctuary cities, such as Newark, where laws limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement efforts. The city of Newark sued GEO Group after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in February awarded a contract to the private prison company for the 1,000-bed immigration processing center, the largest on the U.S. East Coast. (Reporting by Karen Freifeld in Newark; Editing by Frank McGurty and David Gregorio)

Newark mayor's lawyers to seek dismissal of trespass charge, say arrest was targeted

Newark mayor's lawyers to seek dismissal of trespass charge, say arrest was targeted By Karen Freifeld NEWARK, New Jersey (Reuters) -Law...
Stephen Miller re-emerges as an 'untouchable' force in Trump's White HouseNew Foto - Stephen Miller re-emerges as an 'untouchable' force in Trump's White House

Outside of President Donald Trump, no White House official has accumulated more influence in this administration than Stephen Miller, the 39-year-old anti-immigration crusader whose brain and bare-knuckled tactics have been deployed to drive the agenda for the commander in chief. Not Vice President JD Vance. Not chief of staff Susie Wiles. Not anyone else. It is Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, who loaded up scores of executive orders for Trump to sign in his first months back in office  — on topics ranging from the declaration of a national emergency at the southern border to dismantling diversity programs in the federal government and withdrawing the U.S. from the World Health Organization. "Stephen is the president's id," said one former Trump adviser who knows Miller well. "He has been for a while. It's just now he has the leverage and power to fully effectuate it." Democrats have long pointed to Miller, in similar if darker fashion, as the engineer of Trump's most audacious plans and tactics. Though he receded a bit from the spotlight during billionaire Elon Musk's ascendance in the first months of Trump's second term, Miller is re-emerging as a target for the political opposition. "Stephen Miller is responsible for all the bad things happening in the United States," Sen. Ben Ray Luján said, adding that Miller was the force behind "some of the ugliest policies" in Trump's first term. This profile is drawn from interviews and text exchanges with more than a dozen White House officials, lawmakers and Trump-world figures familiar with Miller and his work. Even some of those who praised Miller in interviews were reluctant to be identified because they weren't sure what might anger him — or how the hard-liner might seek payback. As a staffer on the Hill, he threatened to turn activists on fellow Republican aides when their bosses did not line up behind his positions, one senior GOP aide on Capitol Hill recalled. "Uh oh," one senior White House official texted when notified that NBC News was working on a story about Miller. But Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who met Miller when they were both working to sink a bipartisan 2013 immigration overhaul in Congress, had no such reticence. "I think he was an effective [Senate] staffer, and I think he is an exponentially more effective senior staffer in the White House," Cruz said. "I think he has been the chief architect in the White House of the president's extraordinarily successful efforts securing the border," said Cruz, who described Miller as a friend with whom he speaks "regularly." Wearing a second hat as Trump's White House homeland security adviser, Miller has pushed novel policies to restrict citizenship and even legal residency in the U.S. One of the first executive ordershe prepared for Trump, signed on Inauguration Day, would end the 14th Amendment's guarantee that people born in the United States are automatically citizens. Last week, he said that the White House is consideringsuspending the right of habeas corpus— a constitutional protection against unlawful detention — as the administration seeks to continue its deportation program. Like the birthright citizenship order and many other Trump actions, parts of the deportation effort have been impeded on constitutional grounds by federal judges. Miller's voice is the one arguing vociferously — and without evidence — that "Marxist judges" are executing a "judicial coup" by identifying limits on the president's authority. "President Trump built much of his current political success by standing with the American people on immigration, and doing what others have been unwilling or unable to do: close the border," said one top Trump adviser. "There has been no bigger advocate of that in the history of the country than Stephen Miller. That, at its core, is why the president trusts him so much, and relies on him to a degree that is matched by very few." That trust is a big reason Miller's reach extends far beyond the immigration policies for which he became famous during Trump's first term, which includedseparating migrant familiesas a deterrent to illegal immigration. Miller's deputy title doesn't do justice to the amount of influence he has in the White House. In a Signal exchangereported on by The Atlanticin March, Miller silenced Vice President JD Vance's questioning of a pending battery of military strikes in Yemen by asserting that Trump already had given the "green light." He has gained so much authority over such a broad spectrum of policies that Trump told NBC News' "Meet the Press" moderator Kristen Welker in an interview that it would be a "downgrade" if he appointed Miller as national security adviser, usually a high-profile and highly coveted role in any West Wing. "Stephen is much higher on the totem pole than that," Trump said. Trump "meant it" when he said that about Miller, the senior Trump adviser affirmed. "I don't know that there is any policy area where his guidance is not sought. The president might not always go with exactly what he wants, but his input is always listened to." Miller's influence stems from sharing Trump's vision for the country, his fierce public and private defense of Trump's positions, and his supply of a steady stream of policies to implement the president's agenda, according to people who work with him now or have done so in the past. The former Trump adviser said that Miller, who came of age in politics during the tea party era, is more tethered to the values of the Make America Great Again movement than many of his colleagues in the White House. "Stephen has broadened his lane, but it still centers on the forgotten man, the working man, Trump's America," the former Trump adviser said. "That's where he's coming from in all of this." In that way he is like Trump: an elite who embraces populism. Miller  does so with even more zeal than his patron, which may be surprising given his background. He grew up in the cozy Los Angeles suburbs, graduating from Santa Monica High School, where prior alumni included the Brat Pack movie stars Emilio Estevez, Rob Lowe and Robert Downey Jr. Miller, however, never had Trump-level money, and his family lost its home when he was in school,forcing them to moveto a lower-rent area. Then he went to Duke, one of the nation's most prestigious private colleges, where he honed his conservatism before becoming a congressional aide. A staffer for then-Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., Miller was an early enlistee on Trump's first presidential campaign in 2016 and took over speech-writing duties and an immigration portfolio in Trump's first term. When Trump lost the 2020 election, Miller, who echoed Trump's lies about a rigged vote, turned his attention to founding America First Legal, a nonprofit that presaged the early days of Trump's second presidency by filingdozens upon dozens of lawsuitsin cases involving immigration, education, affirmative action and transgender rights. Miller is not a lawyer, but his vision is what has driven much of Trump's legal strategy in the second term. "Stephen Miller works around the clock to implement President Trump's America First policy agenda, and he is doing a phenomenal job," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. "The president fully trusts Stephen and for good reason — he delivers." Miller's plan coming into this term, said one person who has worked with him for years and remains an ally, was to overwhelm the court system in an effort to secure more powers for Trump. "Stephen Miller has been sharpening his teeth for this moment," the ally said, adding an assertion that he is the "most consequential" White House official since Vice President Dick Cheney. Likewise, a lawyer who is close to the White House described Miller as a singular figure in the Trump orbit who methodically prepared to win more unilateral power for the presidency, and by extension himself, even at the cost of losing some battles. "The courts aren't going to strike down all that they're doing, and, at the end of the day, they'll end up accomplishing more by flooding the zone," the lawyer said of the mindset driving Miller and his policy team, which includes Gene Hamilton and May Mailman — who, unlike Miller, have law degrees. "The content of many of these executive orders has his fingerprints," the lawyer close to the White House added of Miller. "You want to get something done in this White House, if you can get to Stephen Miller, there's probably no more effective way to get something done." His symbiotic relationship with Trump requires — or at least encourages — a willingness to parrot the philosophically peripatetic president, even when that means reversing course on policy at a moment's notice or misleading the public, according to people who have worked with him. Miller is "comfortable with misinformationto advance his cause," said one senior first-term Trump White House official who praised his patience and intellect. Critics are more blunt, labelinghis anti-immigrant rhetoric as "propaganda." While Trump has blocked refugees from most of the world from entering the U.S., his administration recently admitted several dozen white South Africans. The reasoning: what Trump administration officialscall a "genocide"against white farmers in the majority-Black nation, which codified discrimination during its apartheid regime. There is no evidence to suggest that there is a genocide. "What's happening in South Africa fits the textbook definition of why the refugee program was created,"Miller saidlast week. "This is race-based persecution. The refugee program is not intended as a solution for global poverty, and historically, it has been used that way." There's little question that Miller is the de facto immigration czar in Trump's Washington — the man the president relies on to turn ideas into action. A week before Trump's inauguration in January, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, reflected on Miller's primacy in an interview with NBC News. Grassley's committee is in charge of writing immigration policies for what Trump calls the "big beautiful" bill designed to implement his legislative agenda in a single fell swoop. But Grassley could not say what would be in that legislation. "The best place to get this answer is from Stephen Miller," Grassley said. It was a remarkable degree of deference from a 44-year veteran of the Senate, who is third in line to the presidency, to an unelected Trump staffer who elicited more eye rolls than legislative achievements when he worked on Capitol Hill as a communications aide about a decade ago. Not every Republican senator is waiting for marching orders from Miller. Sen. Mike Rounds, of South Dakota, replied tersely when asked if he speaks to Miller often: "Nope." In early April, Miller was the featured speaker at a meeting of Senate Republican chiefs of staff, where he pressed aides to encourage their bosses to provide a more fulsome defense of Trump's agenda — including tariffs and the programmatic and personnel cuts developed by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, according to a person who was present. Miller's wife, Katie Miller, is a longtime Musk confidante who worked on his DOGE team, and the couple has formed a close working relationship with the wealthiest man in the world. The Miller ally said Katie Miller has become a powerful force inside the administration, and that the Millers, along with Sergio Gor, the White House personnel chief, are the only "untouchable" members of Trump's White House team. "Stephen has always preached loyalty to the president," said a second White House official. "He is ruthless with bureaucrats being seen as disloyal to the president and his agenda." It's hard to find an arm of the White House, or the wider administration, that doesn't have one of Miller's hands attached — or an argument that isn't phrased in his trademark bombast. On the first day of May, Miller strode into the White House briefing room to offer an aggressive defense of Trump's agenda — the "America First" platform he primarily drafted and executed — amid public concern that its tariff plank was tanking the U.S. economy. Breaking from generations of evidence, economic theory and conservative orthodoxy suggesting that American consumers want cheaper goods, Miller lectured the media on his view — already articulated by Trump — that families would be happy to pay more for toys made in the U.S. than those made in China. Despite his zealously anti-regulation position at most times, Miller even appeared to embrace the value of safety standards that drive domestic prices higher. "If you have a choice between a doll from China that might have, say, lead paint in it that is not as well constructed as a doll made in America that has a higher environmental and regulatory standard and that is made to a higher degree of quality, and those two products are both on Amazon, [then] yes, you probably would be willing to pay more for a better-made American product," Miller said. As he spoke, the French cuffs of his perfectly starched white dress shirt poked out from beneath a dark suit accented with a silky pocket square. Miller's arguments, echoing Trump's almost to the word, quietly vanished Monday as quickly as they had materialized, when the White House announced that the U.S. and China had agreed to back down from their punishing reciprocal tariffs amid the threat of shortages, price increases and long-term damage to both economies. The heat had finally become too much for Trump to bear. No matter how much power Miller wields, he seems well aware that it is derivative — and that it can be taken away as quickly as a tariff if he stands even a step away from his boss. "The president knows he won't leak," the senior Trump adviser said. "He knows he will be an unquestioned fighter for his agenda, and that brand of loyalty is what matters most in a lot of ways."

Stephen Miller re-emerges as an 'untouchable' force in Trump's White House

Stephen Miller re-emerges as an 'untouchable' force in Trump's White House Outside of President Donald Trump, no White House off...

 

TEC POLITICS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com